Having read this article in my print copy of the BMJ, but then using
my phone to access online, I can't help wondering if this horse has
already left the stable?
Before rapid response, Twitter and others, did people not work
themselves into confusion regarding new clinical research?
New social media and the internet in general seems to me to provide a
wider forum for debate then ever before, and if the cost for this is to
take what you read with a pinch of salt, is it not to be welcomed?
Rapid Response:
Rapid Response
Having read this article in my print copy of the BMJ, but then using
my phone to access online, I can't help wondering if this horse has
already left the stable?
Before rapid response, Twitter and others, did people not work
themselves into confusion regarding new clinical research?
New social media and the internet in general seems to me to provide a
wider forum for debate then ever before, and if the cost for this is to
take what you read with a pinch of salt, is it not to be welcomed?
Competing interests: No competing interests