Intended for healthcare professionals

Rapid response to:

Clinical Review

Breast feeding

BMJ 2008; 336 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39521.566296.BE (Published 17 April 2008) Cite this as: BMJ 2008;336:881

Rapid Response:

Important implications for policy choices

That both the Hoddinott et al. and MacArthur et al. randomized trails find no significant changes in breastfeeding rates has important policy implications. These results contrast sharply with the recent recommendation by the USPSTF (p. 560), based on the assessment based on meta analysis, that "there is moderate certainty that interventions to promote and support breastfeeding have a moderate benefit." If these two relatively large trails had been included in the meta analysis, the estimated impacts might have been less or insignificant. In any case these two studies cast doubt on whether the benefit-to-cost ratios for public resources devoted to improving infant nutrition are likely to be sufficiently high for policies to promote breast feeding of the types examined in these studies.

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, “Primary Care Interventions to Promote Breastfeeding: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement,” Annals of Internal Medicine Volume 149:8 (21 October 2008), 560-565.

No competing interests.

Competing interests: None declared

Competing interests: No competing interests

21 February 2009
Jere R. Behrman
Professor of Economics
none
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6297, USA