Are common treatments for infertility really all the same?
The authors conclude that common treatments for infertility do not
seem to enhance fertility. This rather vague statement has been taken up
by the media as meaning that these treatments do not work. The authors’
data do not disprove their null hypothesis of no difference between
treatments. This however does not mean the null hypothesis is true i.e.
the treatments are all equally efficacious. The null hypothesis can never
be proven. If the authors were expecting little difference between
treatments they should have pre specified a non inferiority analysis.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests:
No competing interests
15 August 2008
andrew owen
consultant Cardiologist
Kent and Canterbury Hospital, Canterbury, Kent, UK. CT1 3NQ
Rapid Response:
Are common treatments for infertility really all the same?
The authors conclude that common treatments for infertility do not
seem to enhance fertility. This rather vague statement has been taken up
by the media as meaning that these treatments do not work. The authors’
data do not disprove their null hypothesis of no difference between
treatments. This however does not mean the null hypothesis is true i.e.
the treatments are all equally efficacious. The null hypothesis can never
be proven. If the authors were expecting little difference between
treatments they should have pre specified a non inferiority analysis.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests