>>>>This does not detract from the right of an individual
to check the evidence behind claims such as those from the anti-vaccine
lobby. They don't hold water.<<<<
Are we here, to discuss the websites of your chosen despised anti-
vaccine lobby out there?
I thought this board was to discuss issues raised as a result of, and
in discussion surrounding that which is published in the BMJ.
It strikes me as very odd, when people, supposedly as well qualified
as Tony Floyd, chose simply to rumble on what websites out there, and then
insinuate that discussion here, falls in the same catagory.
I repeat my challenge to Tony Floyd.
If you want to discuss what we are talking about in BMj, why don't
you answer the issues raised HERE? If you don't want to, or can't,
thenexactly what is your point in being here?
How about actually discussing the facts above, for a change?
Rapid Response:
Tony Floyd's response.
Dear Sir,
Tony Floyd says:
>>>>This does not detract from the right of an individual
to check the evidence behind claims such as those from the anti-vaccine
lobby. They don't hold water.<<<<
Are we here, to discuss the websites of your chosen despised anti-
vaccine lobby out there?
I thought this board was to discuss issues raised as a result of, and
in discussion surrounding that which is published in the BMJ.
It strikes me as very odd, when people, supposedly as well qualified
as Tony Floyd, chose simply to rumble on what websites out there, and then
insinuate that discussion here, falls in the same catagory.
I repeat my challenge to Tony Floyd.
If you want to discuss what we are talking about in BMj, why don't
you answer the issues raised HERE? If you don't want to, or can't,
thenexactly what is your point in being here?
How about actually discussing the facts above, for a change?
Sincerely,
Hilary Butler.
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests