A reduction of mortality rate of one quarter per six months would be
a spectacular result for any intervention..
Greater than most common interventions.
This study was not designed, powered, or analysed so as to enable us
to know how much of this benefit to credit to the 100% increase in
Phamacist, the 45% in GP, or the 30% in hospital episodes.
It seems to have been designed with the primary objective of fewer
hospital admissions..is this a fair assumption?
Sir.
A reduction of mortality rate of one quarter per six months would be
a spectacular result for any intervention..
Greater than most common interventions.
This study was not designed, powered, or analysed so as to enable us
to know how much of this benefit to credit to the 100% increase in
Phamacist, the 45% in GP, or the 30% in hospital episodes.
It seems to have been designed with the primary objective of fewer
hospital admissions..is this a fair assumption?
Kind regards
David Leopold
Consultant Physician
South Wales
Competing interests:
None declared
Competing interests: No competing interests