Re: Re: Leibovici's paper is religious propaganda, not science
The reason 93% of scientists do not believe in God is:
1. They recognise that discussion of Divine intervention is
itself a logical fallacy unless you can demonstrate the existence of "the
Divine", in other words God. God's existence is unproven and unprovable,
therefore any talk of his alleged activities, eg intervention of any
kind,is meaningless. The particular fallacy is that of the Double question
or statement; of assuming one thing in order to prove another, eg: "When
did you stop beating your wife?"
2. Scientists do not hold to the Post-Modernist fallacy of claiming
that any opinion is as good as any other. The evolution of the Universe is
rational and causal, and does not require divine, or any other arbitrary
interference. This makes activities by such an interfering and improbable
Agent highly unlikely.
Rapid Response:
Re: Re: Leibovici's paper is religious propaganda, not science
The reason 93% of scientists do not believe in God is:
1. They recognise that discussion of Divine intervention is
itself a logical fallacy unless you can demonstrate the existence of "the
Divine", in other words God. God's existence is unproven and unprovable,
therefore any talk of his alleged activities, eg intervention of any
kind,is meaningless. The particular fallacy is that of the Double question
or statement; of assuming one thing in order to prove another, eg: "When
did you stop beating your wife?"
2. Scientists do not hold to the Post-Modernist fallacy of claiming
that any opinion is as good as any other. The evolution of the Universe is
rational and causal, and does not require divine, or any other arbitrary
interference. This makes activities by such an interfering and improbable
Agent highly unlikely.
Competing interests:
Atheist medical Doctor
Competing interests: No competing interests