Objectives: to seek the views of midwives on the practices related to the perineum in the second stage of labour; to identify predictors of their practices and to identify their actual practices in the second stage of labour, prior to a randomised trial of second stage perineal massage.
Participants and setting: independent midwives in South Australia and 194 midwives working in the delivery suites and birth centres of seven public hospitals in four states of Australia.
Design: midwives were surveyed using a questionnaire which sought their views on, and practices relating to, second stage perineal massage, delivery of the head and reasons for cutting an episiotomy.
Findings: one third of the respondents 'never' practised perineal massage in the second stage of labour, 43% were 'undecided' as to its value and 19% disagreed with the practice. Over half agreed that its use should be decided by the woman and her partner. When invited to select the five statements they most agreed with, and the five they most disagreed with, out of a possible 24, equal numbers (26%) were for and against the statement referring to such massage as helping to stretch the perineum and prevent tearing. More than half (55%) disagreed with the statement which predicted they would find the practice distasteful, while only 1.6% agreed with this statement. During delivery of the head, 71% of respondents attempted some form of flexion. There was 100% agreement that fetal distress almost always or frequently was an indication for cutting an episiotomy.
Conclusions: there is little evidence from randomised trials to support many of the second stage practices, and further research will clarify those which are most effective. This sample of midwives demonstrated considerable variation in their views on, and practices in, the second stage of labour. Although one-fifth disagreed with the practice of second stage perineal massage, and 40% agreed that the midwife should decide, more than half (57%) believed it was a matter of choice for the woman and her partner. All were supportive of episiotomy use for fetal distress.