Percutaneous versus open tracheostomy: a retrospective cohort outcome study

J Trauma. 1996 Aug;41(2):245-8; discussion 248-50. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199608000-00008.

Abstract

Percutaneous tracheostomy has been advocated as a faster, safer, and less invasive method of placing tracheostomy tubes in ventilated patients. To compare outcome differences, as measured by complication rates, between percutaneous and open tracheostomy, a retrospective cohort study was performed. All procedures were performed in the intensive care unit of a university-affiliated hospital. The minor complication rates did not differ significantly between percutaneous and open tracheostomy (12/31 vs. 12/29, respectively; p > 0.05), nor did there appear to be a difference in rates of major complications between the two groups (7/31 vs. 5/29; p > 0.05). This study identified a trend towards an increased risk of delayed airway loss in the percutaneous tracheostomy group.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • APACHE
  • Cohort Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tracheostomy / adverse effects
  • Tracheostomy / methods*
  • Treatment Outcome