Reagent strip testing of antenatal urine specimens for infection

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 Sep;100(9):806-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb14303.x.

Abstract

Objective: To compare reagent strip testing (RST) with microscopy and culture in identifying significant bacteriuria, and secondly, to consider potential cost savings if RST screening proved to be reliable.

Design: Prospective descriptive study.

Setting: Antenatal Clinic, Bristol Maternity Hospital.

Subjects: Eight hundred and ninety-eight women having urine testing in pregnancy for microscopy and culture either routinely or because of a clinical infection.

Interventions: The midstream specimens of urine had RST examination using Ames Multistix 8SG prior to being sent to the laboratory.

Main outcome measure: Significant culture (> 10(5) colonies/ml) of a single organism in culture.

Results: The highest predictive value for a negative result of the urine culture (99.7%) was obtained when using four RSTs in combination. The RST for nitrite had a high predictive value for a positive urine culture (90%). The samples which gave a false negative result with RST screening were mainly infected with low grade urinary pathogens or genital tract contaminants.

Conclusion: RST screening for bacteriuria provides a reliable and cheap alternative to culture of all urine specimens.

MeSH terms

  • Bacteriuria / microbiology
  • Bacteriuria / urine*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Complications, Infectious / microbiology
  • Pregnancy Complications, Infectious / urine*
  • Prenatal Care
  • Prospective Studies
  • Reagent Strips*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Substances

  • Reagent Strips