Elsevier

Heart & Lung

Volume 28, Issue 5, September–October 1999, Pages 365-372
Heart & Lung

Reducing readmissions to the intensive care unit*,**,*

https://doi.org/10.1053/hl.1999.v28.a101055Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: To determine factors that contributed to readmissions to the intensive care unit (ICU) from the general wards. Design: Prospective, descriptive, qualitative, and quantitative. Setting: The Royal Melbourne Hospital, which is a large, metropolitan, university-affiliated tertiary hospital with specialist and general wards. The ICU is a 14-bed medical and surgical adult unit. Patients: 572 patients admitted to ICU between July 1 and December 31, 1993. Results: There were 639 admissions, with 67 (10.5%) being readmissions. This study showed that 63% of all readmissions came from the general wards. The study identified three main factors that contributed to readmissions from the ward: progression of the patient’s illness, postoperative care requirements, and inadequate follow-up care on the general wards. Identifying inadequate continuity of care on the general wards as a cause of readmissions to the ICU led to the appointment of an ICU follow-up nurse to facilitate the transition from the ICU to the general ward. Conclusion: Preliminary results indicate that the appointment of the follow-up nurse has not only reduced the rate of readmissions to the ICU but also decreased the acuity levels of those readmitted. (Heart Lung® 1999;28:365-72)

Section snippets

BACKGROUND

The findings presented in this article are taken from a research project that followed up 639 admissions to the ICU at the Royal Melbourne Hospital between July 1 and December 31, 1993. This ICU is a general medical and surgical unit for adults in a large, metropolitan teaching hospital in Australia. It admits approximately 1300 patients per year. One of the aims of the research was to identify factors that contributed to the readmission rate to the ICU.

Several studies have shown the benefits

METHODS

This project received approval from the Royal Melbourne Hospital’s Board of Medical Research and its Ethics Committee. As a result, the researcher was given access to patients’ medical files and permission to contact patients 6 months after their discharge from the ICU. The researcher was also given permission to interview staff and care providers. It was agreed that patients would be identified with a numeric code; care providers would be identified by their relationship to the patients, for

RESULTS

In this study, there were 639 admissions. As 67 of these were readmissions, the readmission rate was 67/639 (10.5%); 46 patients were admitted to ICU twice, 7 patients were admitted 3 times, 1 patient was admitted 4 times, and 1 patient was admitted 5 times. This resulted in 55 patients requiring a second admission, with 9 of these patients requiring further admissions. The site of origin and categories of illness of these admissions and readmissions are represented in Tables I and II.

.

DISCUSSION

This research identified three main factors that contributed to readmissions from the ward: progression of the patient’s illness, postoperative care requirements, and inadequate follow-up care on the general wards. The inadequate follow-up care was evident in the narratives describing the transition to the general ward. Unlike the ICU, where the staff-to-patient ratio was greater than 1:1 and the access to life-saving treatments was often instantaneous, the nurses on general wards often cared

RECOMMENDATIONS

The main recommendation stemming from this research is to develop strategies to improve continuity of care for patients after their discharge from the ICU. One strategy tried at the Royal Melbourne Hospital is to employ a follow-up nurse. The role of the follow-up nurse is to strengthen the link between the specialized care patients receive in the ICU and their ongoing care. Although the role is to provide support and education to nurses on the wards, a follow-up nurse does not replace clinical

CONCLUSION

When patients are critically ill, they require access to sophisticated technology and skilled health care practitioners in the ICU. Most critically ill patients would die without such life-saving interventions. After close surveillance in the ICU with monitors and specialized medical and nursing care, patients in this study were then discharged to a general ward where there is a significant reduction in the provision of health care services. Unlike the ICU, the general wards were predominantly

References (6)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (45)

  • Handover in Intensive Care

    2018, Medicina Intensiva
  • Evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of a nursing intervention program to facilitate the transition of adult SCI patients and their family from ICU to a trauma unit

    2014, International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing
    Citation Excerpt :

    As for the acceptability of the program, most of the interventions were found acceptable and helpful by patients and families The provision of information by ICU nurses in preparation for the transition, the decrease of nursing surveillance and monitoring equipment before discharge and the introduction to the receiving team were particularly appreciated. These findings confirm the adequacy of recommendations that emerged from studies (Beard, 2005; Chaboyer et al., 2005; Leith, 1999; Odell, 2000; Russell, 1999a,b) on patients’ and families’ transition experience as well as of a recently developped grounded theory on ICU transitional care process (Häggström et al., 2012). This theory was created to address the gap that exists between the high technology ICU environment with its high staff ratio and different ward environments (Häggström et al., 2009).

  • How can nurses facilitate patient's transitions from intensive care?. A grounded theory of nursing.

    2012, Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
    Citation Excerpt :

    In healthcare today, patients are often transferred rapidly and at an earlier stage, and are sicker than in the past (McKinney and Deeny, 2002). There exists a gap between the high-technology environment of the ICU with its high staff ratio and the different ward environment (Häggström et al., 2009) and research has shown that a transition from the ICU needs to be seriously planned and organised – both pre- and post-transfer (cf. Chaboyer et al., 2005b; Odell, 2000; Russell, 1999a,b). It is also of importance that compromised transitional care can result in serious complications and re-admissions to the ICU (Durbin and Kopel, 1993; Russell, 1999b).

  • Readmission to intensive care: A qualitative analysis of nurses' perceptions and experiences

    2011, Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care
    Citation Excerpt :

    Of the second admissions, 38% were respiratory related, 25% were cardiac related, and 22% were postoperative. During the in-depth interviews, 2 key themes emerged: a lack of resources on general wards and a lack of communication between ICU and the ward staff.4 Data from the questionnaires and other interviews also identified progression of the patient's illness, postoperative care requirements, and inadequate care on the wards after ICU discharge (eg, not aspirating a nasogastric tube).

View all citing articles on Scopus
*

From the School of Nursing at La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.

**

Reprint requests: Sarah Russell, BA, RN, PhD, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia 3083.

*

0147-9563/99/$8.00 + 0  2/1/101055

View full text