General Obstetrics and Gynecology: GynecologyColposcopic and histopathologic evaluation of women participating in population-based screening for human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid persistence
Section snippets
Study group
In the organized screening program, women aged 23 to 50 years are invited by letter for screening at 3-year intervals. The files of the population registry are first checked against cytology registries and women who have had a Papanicolaou smear taken within the previous 18 months are not invited. In the present study, the study base was defined as the entire population aged 32 to 38 years resident in 5 different regions in Sweden (Stockholm, Gothenburg, Malmö, Umeå, and Uppsala), with the
Results
Altogether 95 of 195 (48.7%) of the women who underwent colposcopy had an abnormal colposcopy (including all acetowhite lesions), 59 of 100 (59%) in the intervention group with persistent HPV infection and 36 of 95 (37.9%) in the population-based control group (Table I). These lesions predicted CIN 2 or 3 in colposcopy-directed biopsy verified by expert histopathological re-review in 23 of 58 (39.7%) of the women in the intervention group but in only 2 of 36 women in the control group (Table I
Comment
We found that population-based screening for HPV persistence and subsequent referral to colposcopy has a high predictive value (29%) for the presence of CIN 2 or 3. Even among women with 2 consecutive normal cytologies, the positive predictive value was 10%, supporting the concept that additional or alternative screening tools may be required. By design, all women with atypical Papanicolaou smears at enrollment into the study (whether HPV positive or negative) were taken care of according to
Acknowledgments
The participants of the Swedescreen study group were: Ann Kristin Andersson, Ola Forslund, Bengt-Göran Hansson, Anna Palmstierna-Bengtsson, Björn Hagmar, Anders Hjerpe, Bo Johansson, Hilde Larsson, Sven Törnberg, Charlotte Wistrand, Karin Edlund, Göran Wadell, and Margareta Larsson.
References (25)
- et al.
Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: association with organized screening programmes
Lancet
(1987) - et al.
A population-based five-year follow-up study of cervical human papillomavirus infection
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2000) - et al.
Relation of human papillomavirus status to cervical lesions and consequences for cervical-cancer screening
Lancet
(1999) - et al.
Estimates of the world incidence of 25 major cancers in 1990
Int J Cancer
(1999) - et al.
Estimates of the worldwide mortality from 25 cancers in 1990
Int J Cancer
(1999) Papillomaviruses and cancer: from basic studies to clinical application
Natl Rev Cancer
(2002)- et al.
Epidemiological evidence that human papillomavirus causes most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
J Natl Cancer Inst
(1993) - et al.
Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer
N Engl J Med
(2003) - et al.
Lifetime number of partners as the only independent risk factor for human papillomavirus infection: a population-based study
Sex Transm Dis
(1995) - et al.
Persistence of type-specific human papillomavirus infection among cytologically normal women
J Infect Dis
(1994)
Human papillomavirus infection is transient in young women: a population-based cohort study
J Infect Dis
Natural history of cervicovaginal papillomavirus infection in young women
N Engl J Med
Cited by (63)
Options for triage and implications for colposcopists within European HPV-based cervical screening programmes
2021, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyColposcopic and histopathologic evaluation of women with HPV persistence exiting an organized screening program
2020, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyDiagnostic excision of the cervix in women over 40 years with human papilloma virus persistency and normal cytology
2019, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: XCitation Excerpt :Kjaer et al did a population based prospective cohort study on HPV positive women <30 years with normal Pap smear at baseline showing risks of developing CIN3 in 12 years in different HPV genotypes as following: HPV16 26,7%, HPV18 19,1% and HPV31/33 over 14% [9]. The Swedescreen study, involving women aged 32–38 years, described that among women with a normal Pap smear attending organized screening, the positive predictive value of HPV persistence as regards detection of biopsy-confirmed CIN2+ was 29% [10]. Long-term follow-up of this study pointed out that all the HPV-positive women with initially normal cytology either become HPV-negative or developed CIN2+ within seven years [11].
Management of women with human papillomavirus persistence: long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial
2017, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyCitation Excerpt :In the control arm, 111 women were selected at random for mock HPV testing and subsequent colposcopies to control for ascertainment bias (95 women attended). The results of the first study colposcopies have been published.13 Following the first study colposcopy, women who had not been treated for CIN2+ were invited for yearly repeat HPV tests.
Three-year longitudinal data on the clinical performance of the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test in a cervical cancer screening setting
2016, Journal of Clinical VirologyCitation Excerpt :Primary hrHPV-based cervical cancer screening is an important scientific and clinical advance because it offers better reassurance of low cancer risk compared to cytology-only cervical cancer screening conducted at the same interval [11]. The effectiveness and safety of HPV-based primary cervical cancer screening has been assessed in large-scale randomized clinical trials performed in several European countries, Canada, and India [12–25] and in screening cohorts with longitudinal follow-up data from Europe and the United States [26–39]. According to their results, hrHPV testing as a stand-alone test or in combination with cytology (co-testing) increases the sensitivity for detecting women with underlying cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and grade 3 or worse (CIN3+), provides better and longer protection against invasive cervical cancer, and reduces cervical cancer mortality compared to cytology testing alone [12,13,15,18,19,26,32,33,40,41].
Projected Impact of HPV and LBC Primary Testing on Rates of Referral for Colposcopy in a Canadian Cervical Cancer Screening Program
2015, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
Supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Society, Europe Against Cancer, and the EU Biomed 5 project HPV-Based Cervical Cancer Screening.