Original articlesExploring Heterogeneity in Meta-Analysis: Is the L'Abbé Plot Useful?
Section snippets
Example
Dolan-Mullen and colleagues conducted a meta-analysis to assess the effect of prenatal smoking intervention [8]. By pooling results from 11 randomized controlled trials, it was found that intervention increased the rate of smoking cessation during pregnancy (overall rate ratio 2.08; 95% confidence interval 1.74, 2.49), although statistical test showed significant heterogeneity in rate ratio across the trials (χ2 = 35.26, df = 10, P < 0.001). Figure 1, known as a Forrest plot [9], shows the
Stochastic simulation
Stochastic simulation technique was used to explore factors related to the random discrepancies between study points and the overall RR line in the L'Abbé plot. The simulation results reveal that random variation in the distance between a study point and the overall RR line is negatively related to the sample size (Figure 3). It is also observed that the random variation in the distance is greatest when the event rates in the control and the treatment group are 50%.
Therefore, the absolute
Identifying outliers
In Dolan-Mullen et al.'s meta-analysis [8], L'Abbé plot was used to identify “outliers” according to the distance between a trial and the overall RR line.Then the “outliers” were excluded one by one until the statistical test of heterogeneity across trials was no longer significant. Trial-2 should be excluded from the analysis because it is farthest from the overall RR line (Figure 2). However, the standardized distance is greatest for Trial-10 (Table 3). On the other hand, according to the
Discussion
By examining the rates of smoking cessation in the L'Abbé plot, it is suggested that variations in the intensity of interventions, “usual care” controls, and study settings are potential sources of heterogeneity in Dolan-Mullen et al.'s meta-analysis. However, the usefulness of the L'Abbé plot in this example does not necessarily mean that it can reveal important sources of heterogeneity in all meta-analyses, because the potential causes of heterogeneity may be different and data may not be
References (18)
- et al.
Summing up evidenceone answer is not always enough
Lancet
(1998) - et al.
Exploratory or analytic meta-analysisShould we distinguish between them?
J Clin Epidemiol
(1995) - et al.
A meta-analysis of randomized trials of prenatal smoking cessation interventions
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1994) Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated
BMJ
(1994)- Mulrow CD, Oxman AD. Cochrane Collaboration Handbook [updated 9 December 1996]. Available in The Cochrane Library...
Inter-study differenceshow should they influence the interpretation and analysis of results?
Stat Med
(1987)- et al.
Advantages and limitations of metaanalytic regressions of clinical trials data
Online J Curr Clin Trials
(1994) - et al.
Meta-analysis in clinical research
Ann Intern Med
(1987) - et al.
Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews. III. How did the authors synthe size the data and make their conclusions?
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med
(1998)
Cited by (67)
Effects of sedatives on radiologic enema reduction in children with ileocolic intussusception: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2024, European Journal of RadiologySmoking-Cessation Interventions in Appalachia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
2020, American Journal of Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :Homogeneity was also assessed quantitatively using Cochran's Q statistic and the I2 index. Because both the Q statistic and I2 index have low power to detect heterogeneity among a small number of studies,19 a L'Abbé plot was also used to attempt to graphically evaluate homogeneity.20,21 If there was evidence of a violation of the homogeneity assumption, the pooled effect of smoking-cessation intervention programs on smoking abstinence was estimated from a random effects model.
Efficacy of sulbactam for the treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii complex infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2017, Journal of Infection and ChemotherapyCitation Excerpt :The heterogeneity across studies was assessed using the χ2 based Q statistics and I2 test, and was defined as low (I2 = 25%–49%), moderate (I2 = 50%–75%) and high (I2 ≥ 75%) [15]. In case of substantial inconsistency, a L'Abbe plot was employed to graphically identify the potential sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis [16]. Subgroup analyses were conducted by type of infection, study design and antimicrobial agents.
A Meta-analysis of Surgical Outcomes of T4a and Infranotch T4b Oral Cancers
2023, Oncology and TherapyAntibiotics for acute otitis media in children
2023, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews