Antinociceptive, subjective and behavioral effects of smoked marijuana in humans

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-8716(99)00128-3Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether marijuana produced dose-dependent antinociception in humans and, if so, whether endogenous opiates modulate this effect. A total of five male regular marijuana users participated in three test sessions during which they smoked cigarettes containing 0% (placebo) and 3.55% Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) (active). Each of four controlled smoking bouts per session, spaced at 40-min intervals, consisted of nine puffs from active and placebo cigarettes (three cigarettes, three puffs per cigarette, one puff per min). During successive bouts, participants smoked 0, 3, 6 and 9 (0, 3, 9 and 18 cumulative) puffs from active marijuana cigarettes, with the remainder of puffs from placebo cigarettes. Test sessions were identical, except for naltrexone 0, 50 or 200 mg p.o. (randomized, double-blind) administration 1 h before the first smoking bout on the different days. Before smoking, between smoking bouts and postsmoking, participants completed an assessment battery that included antinociceptive (finger withdrawal from radiant heat stimulation), biological, subjective, observer-rated signs and performance measures. Marijuana produced significant dose-dependent antinociception (increased finger withdrawal latency) and biobehavioral effects. Naltrexone did not significantly influence marijuana dose-effect curves, suggesting no role of endogenous opiates in marijuana-induced antinociception under these conditions.

Introduction

Cannabinoid receptor agonists generally produce antinociception in animals; however, the test compound, assay, species, dose and route of administration used can modulate this effect (Harris, 1971, Dewey, 1986, Adams and Martin, 1996, Martin and Lichtman, 1998). Neuropharmacological studies, most using the tail-flick assay, have begun to characterize the mechanisms of cannabinoid antinociception. Two cannabinoid receptor subtypes have been identified; CB1 receptors (nervous system) account for most of marijuana’s effects, whereas CB2 receptors (spleen) mediate immune response (Adams and Martin, 1996). The primary brain site of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) antinociceptive action is at CB1 receptors in the periacqueductal gray (Lichtman et al., 1996), also a principal site of opioid antinociception (Basbaum and Fields, 1984). Cannabinoid antinociception in this region is blocked by the CB1 antagonist SR-141716A (Lichtman and Martin, 1997, Welch et al., 1998) but not systemically administered opioid antagonists (Welch et al., 1995, Vivian et al., 1998), indicating a centrally mediated, opioid-independent mode of action. Recent studies also implicate brainstem circuitry that mediates THC, but not morphine, analgesia (Martin et al., 1998, Meng et al., 1999).

Early studies using opioid antagonists, at high doses that presumably blocked mu, kappa and delta receptors, demonstrated partial attenuation of THC-induced antinociception (Wilson and May, 1975, Tulunay et al., 1981, Ferri et al., 1986). These results suggested that endogenous opiates might partly mediate this effect. Subsequently, a second site of cannabinoid antinociception was identified in the spinal cord (Yaksh, 1981, Lichtman and Martin, 1991, Smith and Martin, 1992), where this effect is blocked by i.t. administration of kappa-opioid antagonists (Welch, 1993a, Welch, 1993b, Smith et al., 1994, Reche et al., 1996) but only partially attenuated by SR-141716A (Welch et al., 1995).

Effects of THC on clinical pain have been infrequently studied in humans, with mixed results (Noyes et al., 1975, Noyes et al., 1976, Raft et al., 1977). Analgesic effects of THC are usually overshadowed by side-effects, e.g. sedation. Cannabinoid effects on human pain sensitivity have been studied in double-blind, placebo-controlled laboratory situations, again with conflicting findings. Single doses of oral THC did not increase pain threshold using cold pressor (25 mg; Karniol et al., 1975) or electrocutaneous stimuli (12 mg; Hill et al., 1974), whereas i.v. THC (0.022 and 0.044 mg/kg) increased pain detection but not tolerance threshold using pressure and electrocutaneous stimulation (Raft et al., 1977). Acute marijuana (cigarettes with ≈1.0% THC) versus placebo smoking did not affect radiant heat (thermode on the forearm) sensitivity in either cannabis-experienced or non-experienced volunteers (Milstein et al., 1974). These negative results may be due to the use of a single low THC dose, smoking procedures that were less well-controlled, a response criterion that was closer to a sensory than a pain threshold, and short mean reaction times (i.e. possibly indicating a ceiling effect). In contrast, Milstein et al. (1975) found significant increases in pain tolerance following marijuana smoking, with slightly (but not significantly) greater effects for cannabis-experienced than non-experienced volunteers. Clark et al. (1981) found a hyperalgesic effect of chronic daily marijuana smoking, relative to a presmoking wash-out period, during a long-term residential study.

Contributing to this uncertain body of literature is the fact that procedures for measuring human pain sensitivity are often unreliable. Lee and Stitzer (1995) developed a procedure in humans that is comparable to the tail-flick assay. This procedure, which requires the participant to withdraw the finger from a radiant heat source under pain threshold instructions, was shown to have better reliability (within- and between-sessions) than an electrocutaneous method. This is also important because THC actually lowered pain threshold (produced hyperalgesia rather than antinociception) in healthy volunteers using electrocutaneous stimulation (Hill et al., 1974). Thermal stimulation has been the predominant laboratory model for evaluating cannabinoid antinociception in animals; we therefore used this method to probe pain sensitivity in marijuana-smoking human volunteers.

This study had three aims. The first aim was to determine whether marijuana smoking produced dose-dependent thermal antinociception in humans, similar to animals. These data were compared with biological, subjective effects, objective signs and performance measures for a complete profile. Psychomotor measures were used to evaluate whether marijuana produced motor deficits versus an inhibition of pain transmission. The second aim was to extend the method of Chait et al. (1988), in which participants smoked 0, 2, 4 and 8 cumulative active (and placebo) puffs across four smoking bouts from cigarettes with 1.4% THC. In the present study, participants smoked a wider range of doses — 0, 3, 9 and 18 cumulative active (and placebo) puffs from cigarettes with 3.55% THC across four bouts. In the Chait et al. study, smoking occurred at 20-min intervals; in the present study, bouts were scheduled every 40-min to collect a broader range of data (see first aim). The third aim was to assess whether endogenous opiates influence marijuana effects in humans, i.e. whether naltrexone pretreatment produced rightward shifts in marijuana dose-response curves. Based on evidence that kappa-opioid antagonists attenuate THC-induced spinal antinociception in animals, we tested high doses of naltrexone to block a higher fraction of kappa (and other opioid) receptors. Naltrexone was used because there are no kappa-selective antagonists presently available for human use, and it has a long duration of action (Verebey et al., 1976) to span the cumulative dosing period.

Section snippets

Participants and screening

The local Institutional Review Board approved this study. All volunteers provided informed consent prior to participation. Male and female recreational drug users aged 18–45 years old were recruited by newspaper advertisements and paid for participation. Before the study, participants underwent a complete medical examination (blood chemistry, electrocardiogram, medical history, urine samples for drug analysis and pregnancy testing, physical examination) and were interviewed about their current

Participant characteristics

A total of 13 participants (nine male, four female) aged 19–27 enrolled in the study and participated in at least the first experimental session. A total of eight (four male, four female) were terminated after the first session. All four females disliked the strength of the marijuana effect. Among the four males, one could not tolerate the blood withdrawal procedure, one coughed excessively which disrupted the controlled smoking procedure, one disliked the strength of the marijuana effect, and

Discussion

The goal of this study was to determine whether smoked marijuana produces dose-related antinociception in humans. The procedure used to test pain sensitivity (finger withdrawal from radiant heat) parallels the tail-flick assay often used in animals to demonstrate the antinociceptive effects of naturally-occurring and synthetic cannabinoid receptor ligands. A cumulative marijuana smoking procedure, extended from work by Chait et al. (1988), was used to evaluate this hypothesis and to efficiently

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by US Public Health Service Research Grant DA-05880 and Research Training Grant DA-07209 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The authors are grateful to David Ginn for medical screening, Rolley E. Johnson for drug preparation, John Yingling for technical assistance, Paula Pakulski for data collection, Valerie Schindler of RTI for analyses of plasma THC, and Mike DiMarino for consultation in statistical analysis.

References (64)

  • S.L. Milstein et al.

    Marijuana produced changes in cutaneous sensitivity and affect: users and non-users

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1974)
  • M. Perez-Reyes et al.

    Antagonism of marihuana effects by indomethacin in humans

    Life Sci.

    (1991)
  • I. Reche et al.

    A role for central cannabinoid and opioid systems in peripheral delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced analgesia in mice

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1996)
  • P.B. Smith et al.

    Spinal mechanisms of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced analgesia

    Brain Res.

    (1992)
  • F.L. Smith et al.

    Characterization of delta 9-tetrahydro-cannabinol and anandamide antinociception in non-arthritic and arthritic rats

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1998)
  • D.P. Tashkin et al.

    Tar, CO and Δ9-THC delivery from the first and second halves of a marijuana cigarette

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1991)
  • A. Tjolsen et al.

    An improved method for tail-flick testing with adjustment for tail-skin temperature

    J. Neurosci. Methods

    (1989)
  • F.C. Tulunay et al.

    Antagonism by chlornaltrexamine of some effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in rats

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1981)
  • I.B. Adams et al.

    Cannabis: pharmacology and toxicology in animals and humans

    Addiction

    (1996)
  • J.L. Azorlosa et al.

    Marijuana smoking: effects of varying Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol content and number of puffs

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (1995)
  • J.L. Azorlosa et al.

    Marijuana smoking: effects of varying puff volume and breathhold duration

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (1995)
  • A.I. Basbaum et al.

    Endogenous pain control systems: brainstem spinal pathways and endorphin circuitry

    Annu. Rev. Neurosci.

    (1984)
  • R.G. Browne et al.

    Discriminative stimulus properties of Δ9-tetrahydro-cannabinol: mechanistic studies

    J. Clin. Pharmacol.

    (1981)
  • L. Chait et al.

    Effects of smoked marijuana on human performance: a critical review

  • W.C. Clark et al.

    Effects of moderate and high doses of marihuana on thermal pain: a sensory decision theory analysis

    J. Clin. Pharmacol.

    (1981)
  • C.E. Cook et al.

    Radioimmunoassays for cannabinoids

  • W.L. Dewey

    Cannabinoid pharmacology

    Pharmacol. Rev.

    (1986)
  • F. Fan et al.

    Development of cross-tolerance between delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol, CP 55940 and WIN 55212

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (1994)
  • S. Ferri et al.

    Possible mediation of catecholaminergic pathways in the antinociceptive effect of an extract of Cannabis sativa L

    Psychopharmacology

    (1986)
  • First, M.B., Spitzer, R.L., Gibbon, M., Williams, J.B.W., 1996. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis...
  • J.P. Gonzalez et al.

    Naltrexone: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in the management of opioid dependence

    Drugs

    (1988)
  • R.R. Griffiths et al.

    Multiple-choice procedure: an efficient approach for investigating drug reinforcement in humans

    Behav. Pharmacol.

    (1993)
  • Cited by (100)

    • Therapeutic potential of opioid/cannabinoid combinations in humans: Review of the evidence

      2020, European Neuropsychopharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Some of these have reported no cannabinoid agonist-induced analgesia with acute heat (Babalonis et al., 2019; Naef et al., 2003; Redmond et al., 2008), cold pressor (Babalonis et al., 2019; Naef et al., 2003; Redmond et al., 2008), or pressure (Babalonis et al., 2019; Naef et al., 2003) assays (acute oral doses: 2.5, 5 mg dronabinol Babalonis et al., 2019; 0.5 mg, 1 mg nabilone [Naef et al., 2003]; 20 mg THC [Redmond et al., 2008]). One reported analgesia from radiant heat pain after smoked cannabis (3.55% THC) (Greenwald and Stitzer, 2000), and one reported a small reduction in heat hyperalgesia in women only after 1 mg nabilone administration (Redmond et al., 2008). In contrast to these findings, three studies have reported cannabinoid agonist-induced hyperalgesia (i.e., increased pain) with heat/capsaicin (8% THC smoked cannabis [Wallace et al., 2007]) and electrical stimulation assays (15 mg oral dronabinol [Kraft et al., 2008], 12 mg smoked THC [Hill et al., 1974]; 20 mg oral THC [Walter et al., 2015]; see brief review by Walter et al., 2015).

    • The treatment of cannabis use disorder

      2018, The Assessment and Treatment of Addiction: Best Practices and New Frontiers
    • Clinical models of decision making in addiction

      2018, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
    • Antinociceptive effects of HUF-101, a fluorinated cannabidiol derivative

      2017, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cannabis has been used to treat pain for centuries. Several studies show that its main psychoactive constituent, ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), has antinociceptive activity in acute and chronic pain models in animals and humans (Bagüés et al., 2014; Britch et al., 2017; Cox and Welch, 2004; Greenwald and Stitzer, 2000; Lynch and Ware, 2015). Cannabidiol (CBD) is another abundant component of Cannabis sativa plant.

    • Cannabidiol-Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol interactions on acute pain and locomotor activity

      2017, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cannabis has been used to treat pain for centuries (reviewed in Aggarwal et al., 2008). The main psychoactive constituent of cannabis, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), produces antinociception in studies of acute pain in animals (Smith et al., 1998; Tseng and Craft, 2001; Varvel et al., 2005) and in humans (Greenwald and Stitzer, 2000). Cannabinoids such as THC also produce antinociception against chronic pain in animals (Cox and Welch, 2004; Mao et al., 2000; Schley et al., 2006) and in humans (reviewed in Lynch and Ware, 2015).

    • An Exploratory Human Laboratory Experiment Evaluating Vaporized Cannabis in the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain From Spinal Cord Injury and Disease

      2016, Journal of Pain
      Citation Excerpt :

      After overnight delivery, the cannabis was stored in a freezer at the Sacramento VA Medical Center Research Pharmacy using precautionary measures (eg, limited access to the pharmacy with an alarm system to protect against diversion). A cumulative dosing scheme was used to determine dosing relationships for analgesia, psychoactive, and cognitive effects as recommended by previous investigators.23,46 Participants inhaled 4 puffs after baseline data were obtained (Fig 1).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text