British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards
Introduction
Intrauterine growth restriction is associated with increased risks of stillbirth, neonatal death and other adverse outcomes1. Since fetal growth is difficult to measure, small for gestational age (SGA) is often used as a proxy for intrauterine growth restriction. However, SGA is a heterogeneous category, including not only growth restricted infants, but also infants with chromosomal abnormalities2 and small, healthy infants. Population-based birthweight standards define SGA as the lowest 10th or 5th centile, or as two standard deviations below the mean birthweight for gestational age. The individualised or customised growth standard sets an optimal fetal growth rate for each pregnancy, based on maternal anthropometrics, parity and ethnic background, thus providing an attempt to separate intrauterine growth restriction from the small, healthy infant. Previous studies have shown that this method improves prediction of infants at risk of poor neonatal outcomes such as the need for operative delivery for fetal distress, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, or artificial ventilation3. Using a large nationwide dataset, we constructed an individually adjustable or ‘customised’ and a fixed population based birthweight standard. These standards were used to compare risks of stillbirth, neonatal death and Apgar score below 4 at 5 minutes in infants classified as SGA by either birthweight standard.
Section snippets
Methods
The Swedish Birth Register, held by the National Board of Health and Welfare, contains data on more than 99% of all births in Sweden4. Information is collected prospectively, and includes demographic data, reproductive history, and complications during pregnancy, delivery and the neonatal period. Copies of the standardised individual antenatal, obstetric, and paediatric records are forwarded to the Birth Registry, where the information is stored. All births and deaths are validated every year
Results
Table 1 displays maternal characteristics and risks of SGA by population based and customised standards (the lowest 10% of birthweights according to each classification). Teenage mothers had a 50% increase in risk of SGA by population standards, but no increase in risk by customised standards. Mothers who were 30 years or more had no increased risk of SGA by the population standard, but an increased risk of SGA by the customised standard. Primiparity was associated with an almost doubled risk
Discussion
This study compares two methods of identifying small for gestational age births: a population based standard, adjusted only for gestational length and fetal gender and similar to a variety of national standards in common use; and a customised birthweight standard, based on the prediction of optimal growth in each individual pregnancy. Our conclusion is that the latter has an improved capacity to identify adverse effects related to fetal growth restriction, such as stillbirth, neonatal death,
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grants from Förenade Liv, Mutual Group Life Insurance Company, Stockholm, Sweden.
References (15)
- et al.
Adverse outcomes in post-term births: the role of fetal growth restriction and malformations
Obstet Gynecol
(1999) - et al.
Fetal growth retardation: associated malformations and chromosomal abnormalities
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1993) - et al.
Customised antenatal growth charts
Lancet
(1992) - et al.
Application of a customised birthweight standard in the assessment of perinatal outcome in a high risk population
Br J Obstet Gynaecol
(1998) - et al.
A quality study of a medical birth registry
Scand J Soc Med
(1990) - The Swedish Council on Technological Assessment in Health Care. Report No. 139. Stockholm, Sweden, 1998: p. 48 (In...
- et al.
Psychological complications after stillbirth - influence of memories and immediate management: population based study
BMJ
(1996)
Cited by (395)
Diagnostic performance of 32 vs 36 weeks ultrasound in predicting late-onset fetal growth restriction and small-for-gestational-age neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2024, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology MFMStillbirth risk and smallness for gestational age according to Hadlock, INTERGROWTH-21st, WHO, and GROW fetal weight standards: analysis by maternal ethnicity and body mass index
2023, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyClinical Indications for Growth Hormone Therapy
2022, Advances in PediatricsAccuracy of estimated fetal weight assessment in fetuses with abdominal wall defects
2021, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology MFMThe impact of volume and neonatal level of care on outcomes of moderate and late preterm infants
2024, Journal of PerinatologyRelation of antepartum stillbirth to birthweight and gestational age: Prospective cohort study
2024, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology