EssayEvidence in consultations: interpreted and individualised
References (32)
The placebo in general practice
Lancet
(1994)- et al.
How can we test clinical reasoning
Lancet
(1995) - et al.
Report card from McMaster: student evaluation at a problem-based medical school
Lancet
(1995) Uses and sources of medical knowledge
Lancet
(1991)The need for humanised science in evaluating medication
Lancet
(1972)- et al.
Evidence based medicine
BMJ
(1995) Medical practice and the double-blind randomised controlled trial
Br J Gen Pract
(1991)- et al.
Inpatient general medicine is evidence based
Lancet
(1995) - et al.
Evidence based general practice: a retrospective study of interventions in one training practice
BMJ
(1996) Anatomy of a decision
JAMA
(1990)
What physicians know
N Engl J Med
Doctors talking to patients
The doctor, his patient and the illness
The inner consultation
What can doctors do to achieve a successful consultation: videotaped consultations analysed by a consultation map method
J Fam Pract
The consultation: an approach to learning and teaching
Cited by (34)
A study exploring the association of attitude and treatment satisfaction with glycaemic level among gestational diabetes mellitus patients
2015, Primary Care DiabetesCitation Excerpt :It is well understood that physicians, nurses and other healthcare professionals cannot deal with the disease alone but with individuals who are ill or concerned about their health. A patient centred clinical method recognizes this and specifically teaches practitioners about ways of integrating the patients’ perspective with the consultation [8]. When this integrated approach is achieved, process and outcomes of care can improve [9].
What do general practioners think about evidenced-based medicine? A study with focus groups
2010, Atencion PrimariaPaternalism, participation and partnership-The evolution of patient centeredness in the consultation
2009, Patient Education and CounselingAccounting for EBM: Notions of evidence in medicine
2006, Social Science and MedicineHealth professionals, their medical interventions and uncertainty: A study focusing on women at midlife
2006, Social Science and MedicineTreating individuals 2: Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: Importance, indications, and interpretation
2005, LancetCitation Excerpt :However, when trials were first developed for use in agriculture, researchers were presumably concerned about the effect of interventions on the overall size and quality of the crop rather than on the wellbeing of any individual plant. Clinicians have to make decisions about individuals, and how best to use results of RCTs and systematic reviews to do this has generated considerable debate.6–22 Unfortunately, this debate has polarised, with statisticians and predominantly non-clinical (or non-practising) epidemiologists warning of the dangers of subgroup analysis and other attempts to target treatment, and clinicians warning of the dangers of applying the overall results of large trials to individual patients without consideration of pathophysiology or other determinants of individual response.