Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 345, Issue 8961, 27 May 1995, Pages 1326-1330
The Lancet

Accuracy of clinical assessment of deep-vein thrombosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92535-XGet rights and content

Abstract

The clinical diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis is generally thought to be unreliable. From experience, we hypothesised that this widely held view might be incorrect. We developed a clinical model and prospectively tested its ability in three tertiary care centres to stratify symptomatic outpatients with suspected deep-vein thrombosis into groups with high, moderate, or low probability groups of deep-vein thrombosis. We evaluated our clinical model in combination with venous ultrasonography to determine the potential for an improved and simplified diagnostic approach in patients with suspected deep-vein thrombosis. All patients were clinically assessed to determine the probability for deep-vein thrombosis before they had ultrasonography and venography. All tests were performed and interpreted by independent observers. In 529 patients, the clinical model predicted prevalence of deep-vein thrombosis in the three categories: 85% in the high pretest probability category, 33% in the moderate, and 5% in the low category. There was no statistical difference in the performance of the model in the three centres. The model demonstrated excellent interobserver reliability (Kappa=0.85). There were important differences with ultrasonography between the high and low pretest probability groups for both positive predictive values (100% (95% Cl, 94-100%) vs (63% [35-85%], respectively). Thus, use of the clinical model combined with ultrasonography would decrease the number of false positive and negative diagnosis if venography were done when the ultrasound result and pretest probability were discordant. The diagnostic process could be simplified by excluding those patients with low pretest probability and normal ultrasound results from serial testing.

References (24)

  • Da Sandler et al.

    Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis: comparison of clinical evaluation, ultrasound plethysmography and venoscan with x-ray venogram

    Lancet

    (1984)
  • K. Haeger

    Problems of acute deep venous thrombosis. The interpretation of signs and symptoms

    Angiology

    (1969)
  • J. McLachlin et al.

    An evaluation of clinical signs in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis

    Arch Surg

    (1962)
  • Ma Bettmann et al.

    Contrast venography of the leg: diagnostic efficacy, tolerance and complication rates with ionic and non-ionic contrast media

    Radiology

    (1987)
  • Awa Lensmg et al.

    Diagnosis of venous thrombosis

  • H. Heijboer et al.

    A comparison of real-time compression ultrasound with impedance plethysmography for the diagnosis of DVT in symptomatic outpatients

    N Engl J Med

    (1993)
  • Dr Anderson et al.

    Limitations of impedence plethysmography in the diagnosis of clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis

    Ann Intern Med

    (1993)
  • R. Hull et al.

    Impedence plethysmography using the occlusive cuff technique in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis

    Circulation

    (1976)
  • K. Rabinov et al.

    Roentgen diagnosis of venous thrombosis in the leg

    Arch Surg

    (1972)
  • T. Colton

    Statistics in Medicine

    (1974)
  • Dl Sackett et al.

    The clinical examination

  • Cited by (691)

    • Excluding pregnancy-associated deep vein thrombosis with whole-leg ultrasound

      2023, Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text