ArticlesTeam approach versus ad hoc health services for young people with physical disabilities: a retrospective cohort study
Introduction
Late adolescence and early adulthood are characterised by two important transitions: from family life to independent living, and from education to employment.1 Generally this period is one of change and of growing independence, but for the disabled teenager it has been described as “hurtling into a void”.2 Young people with chronic illness or physical disabilities are often vulnerable in terms of their emotional and behavioural development3 and, consequently, their experience of the transition years is different from that of their peers.4 Adolescents are mainly concerned with consolidating identity, achieving independence from parents, establishing adult relationships, and finding a vocation,5 but chronic disease inevitably has implications for a child's development. For instance, there might be physical limitations, academic and social difficulties from interruptions in schooling, and cognitive problems. Furthermore, that the child has spent much of their time in the company of adults, rather than peers, can have a detrimental effect.6 The strain of having to deal with a disability together with the normal changes associated with adolescence, can result in psychological crises.7
Compared with their non-disabled peers, a large proportion of young people with physical disabilities have great difficulty in attaining a similar degree of independence in adult life.8 These young people need a lot of support both from their parents and from health-care and social-care services. In this situation, health professionals have unique opportunities to promote the social and occupational integration of disabled and chronically ill youths, helping them maximise their participation in society.1 However, medical care often breaks down at this point for several reasons—eg, the young person might move away from home, parents might stop taking responsibility for hospital check-ups, and adult clinics usually have a less family-centred approach than do paediatric services.9 Furthermore, young people and their parents often feel a sense of loss when they have to leave the care of the paediatricians and nurses whom they have known for many years.10 These professionals can also be reluctant to relinquish responsibility for the young people, whom they have cared for through many stages of their lives, and whose complex needs they know in detail.9 This reluctance can be in the interest of the young person, if the paediatrician has little confidence in the skills of the accepting doctor,10 or to the detriment of the individual, if transfer is resisted because of emotional attachment.9 Poor hand-over to adult services can also take place if young people have no statement of special educational need or are attending a further education college.11 Collectively, these barriers to transition to adult services need to be removed, since the way in which a young person is transferred determines, to a large extent, their use of health-care services during adult life.12
Organisations that offer services to young people with disabilities or chronic illness have to ensure that there is ample opportunity for the individual to take part in processes of personal growth.13 Proper help in transition from childhood to adulthood enables a young person to become a citizen who contributes to society, whereas an adolescent who is forced into a passive role might have to endure five or more decades of dependency. The resultant burden affects the individual, those who care for the young person, and society as a whole.14
Health services are often provided in an ad hoc manner by many different organisations, each with their own criteria for defining who receives support. As a consequence, overall care is often fragmented and does not address the psychosocial issues of disability as well as the physical aspects.4, 7 Such arrangements do not meet the important health needs of young disabled people,15 and it has been suggested that specialist teams to attend to the needs of handicapped adults should be set up in all district health authorities to provide a coordinated service.16 A report by the UK National Audit Office,17 looking at health services for physically disabled people aged 16–65 years, echoes these opinions, concluding that services are urgently required. Results of research18 also suggest that to facilitate transition, reliable, accessible, and high quality services that address all aspects of adult life are important.
In response to these complex needs a few multidisciplinary teams have been developed, the first of which was led by Robinson,14 who did much to help young adults with spina bifida. Two other teams, in Stoke on Trent and Leeds, UK, have been assessed by grants from the Nuffield Trust, and high user satisfaction was reported.19 Team-based approaches (usually called young adult team [YAT] services), few of which exist in the UK, involve multidisciplinary specialist teams developed specifically to facilitate transition from childhood to adulthood services, which typically include a consultant in rehabilitation medicine, a psychologist, therapists, and a social worker. These same professionals are likely to be available in most health services, but the pattern of service delivery here is characterised by individual professionals, usually working in isolation, with links between them being of an ad hoc nature.
The outcomes of YAT services have not been compared with those of existing, uncoordinated services. We postulated that team-based approaches would increase the degree of participation of young people with physical disabilities in society more than would ad hoc services. Our aim was to assess this hypothesis, and to ascertain the cost-effectiveness of the two approaches.
Section snippets
Participants
We included in our analyses young physically disabled people from Leeds, Stoke on Trent, Leicester, and Birmingham, UK, who we identified from YAT case files, and from a list of all young people who had recently received or were receiving paediatric care in the UK National Health Service. In addition, for Leeds only, by review of 600 case notes of past paediatric patients. The number of individuals recruited from each area was consistent with epidemiological evidence and the predicted
Results
We reviewed 2000 case notes, 400 of which were for individuals with an appropriate diagnosis. Of the 400, 56 individuals were not in the target group, 18 had died, and 72 refused to participate. Table 1 shows the number of individuals recruited in each area. We interviewed 254 (134 men, 120 women) young people aged 17–28 years (mean 20·4, SD 2·3) with physical and complex disabilities. 68% (173) had been disabled since birth. Almost a quarter (58, 23%) had communication difficulties sufficient
Discussion
Our findings indicate no differences in terms of age, congenital or acquired disability, health, or ability to manage finances, degrees of impairment, activity limitation, or psychosocial status between individuals who use ad hoc and YAT services. However, young people with complex neurological disabilities who have access to YAT services are more likely than those who use ad hoc services to participate in society. Pain, fatigue, and stress also affected participation in society. Furthermore,
References (37)
Youths with chronic illness and disability on their way to social and economic participation: a health-care perspective
J Adolesc Health
(1992)- et al.
Young Adults with arthritis: meeting their transitional needs
Br J Rheumatol
(1996) Psychological effects of chronic disease
J Child Psychol Psychiatry
(1990)- et al.
Disability in adulthood: ten-year follow up of young people with disabilites
Disabil Handicap Soc
(1989) - et al.
Developing community-based services for youth with disabilities
Paediatrician
(1991) Growing up with a chronic disease: the impact on children and their families
(1993)Disability and the transition to adulthood: issues for the disabled child, the family, and the paediatrician
Cur Probl Paediatr
(1995)- et al.
Unequal opportunities: growing up disabled 1994
(1994) Transition from paediatric to adult care: bridging the gap or passing the buck?
Arch Dis Child
(1999)
Transition from school to adult life for physically disabled young people
Arch Dis Child
Research into practice: hurtling into a void‐transition to adulthood for young disabled people with ‘complex health and support needs’
Psychology of adolescent development
The approach of rehabilitation services
Health care of physically handicapped young adults
BMJ Clin Research Ed
The provision of support services for the handicapped young adult
Health services for physically disabled people aged 16-64 years
The second shock: a qualitative study of parents’ and needs during their child's transition from school to adult life
J Assoc Persons Severe Handicaps
Cited by (103)
What Do We Need to Know About Transition/Transfer Programs and What Sort of Research Will Answer the Questions?
2020, Seminars in Pediatric NeurologySocial participation and psychosocial outcomes of young adults with chronic physical conditions: Comparing recipients and non-recipients of disability benefits
2018, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineOutcome Evidence for Structured Pediatric to Adult Health Care Transition Interventions: A Systematic Review
2017, Journal of PediatricsImplementation of a Transdisciplinary Team for the Transition Support of Medically and Socially Complex Youth
2015, Journal of Pediatric NursingChanges in gross motor function and health-related quality of life in adults with cerebral palsy: An 8-year follow-up study
2014, Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationLagging behind or not? Four distinctive social participation patterns among young adults with chronic conditions
2014, Journal of Adolescent Health