ArticleChildren's food intake following drinks sweetened with sucrose or aspartame: Time course effects☆
References (29)
Preschool children's food preferences and consumption patterns
J. Nutr. Educ.
(1979)- et al.
Conditioned and unconditioned caloric compensation: Evidence for self regulation of food intake by young children
Learn. Motiv.
(1985) - et al.
“Clean up your plate”: Effects of child feeding practices on the development of intake regulation
Learn. Motiv.
(1987) - et al.
Paradoxical effects of an intense sweetener (aspartame) on appetite
Lancet
(1986) - et al.
Uncoupling sweetness and calories: Methodological aspects of laboratory studies on appetite control
Appetite
(1988) - et al.
Starch content of ordinary foods associatively conditions human appetite and satiation, indexed by intake and eating pleasantness of starch-paired flavors
Appetite
(1982) - et al.
The role of carbohydrate in appetite, hunger and obesity
Appetite
(1982) Effect of liquid and solid preloads in eating behavior of obese and normal persons
Physiol. Behav.
(1973)- et al.
Comparison of the effects of aspartame and sucrose on appetite and food intake
Appetite
(1988) - et al.
Human eating behavior: A critical review of studies in normal weight and normal weight individuals
Appetite
(1981)
Effects of fructose and glucose preloads on subsequent food intake
Appetite
Aspartame: Effects on appetite and food intake in children
Fed.Abstr.
Postprandial glucose and insulin responses to meals containing different carbohydrates in normal and diabetic subjects
N. Engl. J. Med.
Dimensions of preschool children's food preferences
J. Nutr. Educ.
Cited by (159)
Inter-individual differences in children's short-term energy compensation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2023, American Journal of Clinical NutritionThe effect of preload/meal energy density on energy intake in a subsequent meal: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2017, Eating BehaviorsCitation Excerpt :Nine studies were conducted in children (Araya et al., 1999; Birch et al., 1990; Johnson et al., 1991; Kral et al., 2012; Cecil et al., 2005; Birch et al., 1989; Leahy et al., 2008; Birch et al., 1993; Karl et al., 2013) and others assessed the effects of preload/meal energy density on energy intake in a subsequent meal(s) among adults. In the studies, energy density was manipulated by modifying the water (Rolls et al., 1999a; Rolls et al., 1998; Araya et al., 1999; Norton et al., 2006; Rolls et al., 1999b; Rolls & Roe, 2002; Kral et al., 2004; James et al., 2015) or fat content (Johnson et al., 1991; Cecil et al., 2005; Birch et al., 1993; Kral et al., 2004; Vera et al., 1996; Luscombe-Marsh et al., 2013; Pritchard et al., 2014; Rolls et al., 2004; Ortinau et al., 2014; Reyna et al., 2015), increasing the quantity of fruits and vegetables consumed (Blatt et al., 2012; Chang et al., 2010), and by modifying carbohydrate (Birch et al., 1990; Kral et al., 2012; Birch et al., 1989; Gray et al., 2004; Gray et al., 2003; Rolls et al., 1988; Rolls et al., 1989; Van de Ven et al., 1994; Schiöth et al., 2015) or fiber content (Isaksson et al., 2008). Six studies used other methods or did not report the method that was used to manipulate energy density (Leahy et al., 2008; Schiöth et al., 2015; Mazlan et al., 2006; Perrigue et al., 2009; Rolls et al., 1990; Shaffer & Tepper, 1994).
The relative reinforcing value of sweet versus savory snack foods after consumption of sugar- or non-nutritive sweetened beverages
2017, AppetiteCitation Excerpt :That is, 4 h after consuming a NSB at lunch, the participants were willing to do more work to gain access to a sweet snack than a salty/savory snack. In contrast, Birch and colleagues (Birch, McPhee, & Sullivan, 1989) found that children's test meal food choices after NSB and SSB consumption depended on individual preferences for the foods not on the taste profile of the foods. Though there was an increase in the RRV of sweet snack foods and sweet snack food calories after consumption of NSB, measures of appetite or total snack food energy intake did not differ between the NSB and SSB conditions.
Orexin/hypocretin receptor 1 signaling mediates Pavlovian cue-food conditioning and extinction
2016, Physiology and Behavior
- ☆
This research was supported by NIH grant RO1-HD19752 and a grant from the Dart-Kraft Corporation.