Skip to main content
Log in

Use of Calcium Supplements, Vitamin D Supplements and Specific Osteoporosis Drugs Among French Women Aged 75–85 Years: Patterns of Use and Associated Factors

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Despite the availability of effective preventive and curative medications for osteoporosis, and guidelines for its diagnosis and management, few individuals are treated for osteoporosis, even among those who have already had a fracture.

Objectives

Our objective was to describe the patterns of use of medication for osteoporosis, i.e., calcium supplements, vitamin D supplements, and specific anti-osteoporotic drugs, such as bisphosphonates, in a large sample of French older women living at home, and to identify individual factors associated with use of these medications overall and in two specific clinical situations.

Methods

Cross-sectional analysis of data from 4,221 women aged 75–85 years who participated in a balance and mobility examination as part of the screening procedure for the Ossébo study, a randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of exercise for the prevention of fall-related injuries. Electoral rolls were used to invite women in 16 towns to participate (participation rate 10.3 %). Information collected through questionnaires included current medication use and, in particular, use of osteoporosis medications (specific osteoporosis drugs, calcium and vitamin D supplementation) in the past 6 months, and history of fracture since the age of 50, including fracture locations. Fractures were categorized in three groups: no fracture, major osteoporotic fracture (hip, humerus, wrist, pelvis, and vertebra), and other fracture.

Results

Nearly 48 % of the participants reported they did not take calcium or vitamin D supplements or any specific osteoporosis drugs. Of the 2,133 women who reported using osteoporosis medication, 85 % used vitamin D supplements (25 % as the sole medication against this disease), 59 % calcium supplements, and 42 % a specific anti-osteoporotic drug (75 % of them combining it with vitamin D supplementation). The use of any osteoporosis medication was significantly associated (p < 0.001) with a history of a major osteoporotic fracture, lower weight, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone-density measurement in the past 5 years, a cancer-screening examination in the past 5 years, and a positive attitude toward medication use in general. Living alone was associated with a lower likelihood of using a specific anti-osteoporotic drug, and a higher education level was associated with a higher likelihood of vitamin D supplementation. Of the 1,553 women who had already had a major osteoporotic fracture, one-third (34.8 %) were not taking any osteoporosis medication. In this subgroup, use of this medication was associated with the same factors as in the overall study population. In particular, neither older age nor a history of falls in the previous 12 months was associated with a higher likelihood of using osteoporosis medication. Among the 909 women who reported using a specific osteoporosis drug, vitamin D use was associated with a higher educational level and a more frequent preventive attitude.

Conclusion

In France, as in other western countries, women aged 75 years and over are not managed according to guidelines. Further studies should address the barriers encountered in improving quality of care in osteoporosis management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sambrook P, Cooper C. Osteoporosis. Lancet. 2006;367:2010–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Delmas PD. Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Lancet. 2002;359:2018–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Poole KE, Compston JE. Osteoporosis and its management. BMJ. 2006;333:1251–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Scharla S. Prevention of low-trauma fractures in older people. Lancet. 2005;366:543.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pignolo R. Evaluation of bone fragility and fracture prevention. In: Pignolo RJ, Keenan MA, Hebala NM, editors. Fractures in the elderly: a guide to practical management. New York: Human Press; 2011. p. 309–25.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Vernay M, Spongo M, Salanave B, Oléko A, et al. Statut en vitamine D de la population adulte en France: l’étude nationale nutrition santé (ENNS, 2006–2007). BEH. 2012;16–17:189–194.

  7. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Willett WC, Orav EJ, et al. A pooled analysis of vitamin D dose requirements for fracture prevention. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:40–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Woolf AD, Akesson K. Preventing fractures in elderly people. BMJ. 2003;327:89–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giangregorio L, Papaioannou A, Cranney A, et al. Fragility fractures and the osteoporosis care gap: an international phenomenon. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2006;35:293–305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Andrade SE, Majumdar SR, Chan KA, et al. Low frequency of treatment of osteoporosis among postmenopausal women following a fracture. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2052–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bessette L, Ste-Marie LG, Jean S, et al. The care gap in diagnosis and treatment of women with a fragility fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:79–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Feldstein A, Elmer PJ, Orwoll E, et al. Bone mineral density measurement and treatment for osteoporosis in older individuals with fractures: a gap in evidence-based practice guideline implementation. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2165–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gehlbach SH, Avrunin JS, Puleo E, et al. Fracture risk and antiresorptive medication use in older women in the USA. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18:805–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaufman JD, Bolander ME, Bunta AD, et al. Barriers and solutions to osteoporosis care in patients with a hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:1837–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Simonelli C, Killeen K, Mehle S, et al. Barriers to osteoporosis identification and treatment among primary care physicians and orthopedic surgeons. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:334–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnell K, Fastbom J. Undertreatment of osteoporosis in the oldest old? A nationwide study of over 700,000 older people. Arch Osteoporos. 2009;4:17–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ankri J, Beaufils B, Ledisert B, et al. Comportement vis à vis des médicaments et représentations de soi chez des personnes âgées souffrant de maladies chroniques. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:337–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, et al. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24:23–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Castel H, Bonneh DY, Sherf M, et al. Awareness of osteoporosis and compliance with management guidelines in patients with newly diagnosed low-impact fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2001;12:559–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Verbrugge FH, Gielen E, Milisen KK, et al. Who should receive calcium and vitamin D supplementation? Age Ageing. 2012;41:576–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Carmel AS, Shieh A, Bang H, et al. The 25(OH)D level needed to maintain a favorable bisphosphonate response is ≥33 ng/ml. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23:2479–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Briançon D, Gaudemar (de) JB, Forestier R. Management of osteoporosis in women with peripheral osteoporotic fracture after 50 years of age: a study of practices. Joint Bone Spine. 2004;71:128–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Elliot-Gibson V, Bogoch ER, Jamal SA, et al. Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15:767–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Leslie WD, Giangregorio LM, Yogendran M, et al. A population-based analysis of the post-fracture care gap 1996–2008: the situation is not improving. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23:1623–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Greenspan SL, Wyman A, Hooven FH, et al. Predictors of treatment with osteoporosis medications after recent fragility fractures in a multinational cohort of postmenopausal women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:455–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Devold HM, Sogaard AJ, Tverdal AT, et al. Hip fracture and other predictors of anti-osteoporosis drug use in Norway. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24:1225–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Briot K, Cortet B, Thomas T, et al. 2012 update of French guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Joint Bone Spine. 2012;79:304–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dargent-Molina P, Favier F, Grandjean H, et al. Fall-related factors and risk of hip fractures: the epidos prospective study. Lancet. 1996;348:145–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. INSEE. Les personnes âgées. Collection références, INSEE éditeur, Paris; 2005.

  30. Curtis JR, Wesfall AO, Allison J, et al. Agreement and validity of pharmacy data versus self-report for use of osteoporosis medication among chronic glucocorticoid users. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006;15:710–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ismail AA, O’Neill TW, Cockerill W, et al. Validity of self-report of fractures: results from a prospective study in men and women across Europe. EPOS study group. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11:248–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sanders KM, Pasco JA, Ugoni AM, et al. The exclusion of high trauma fractures may underestimate the prevalence of bone fragility fractures in the community: the Geelong osteoporosis study. J Bone Miner Res. 1998;13:1337–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Peeters GM, Tett SE, Dobson AJ, et al. Validity of self-reported osteoporosis in mid-age and older women. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24:917–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dargent-Molina P, Poitiers F, Bréart G, for the EPIDOS group. In elderly women weight is the best predictor of a very low bone mineral density: evidence from the EPIDOS study. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11:881–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Benhamou CL, Souberbielle JC, Cortet B, et al. La vitamine D chez l’adulte: recommandations du GRIO. Presse Med. 2011;40:673–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Black DM, Bauer DC, Schwartz AV, et al. Continuing bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis: for whom and for how long. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2051–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bolland MJ, Grey A, Avenell A, et al. Calcium supplements with or without vitamin D and risk of cardiovascular events: reanalysis of the Women’s health initiative limited access dataset and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011;342:d2040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the directors of the clinical investigation centers who helped them conduct this study: Dr J. Arvieu (Boulogne-Billancourt), Prof. G. Berrut (Nantes), Prof. F. Blanchard (Reims), Prof. M. Bonnefoy (Lyon), Dr E. Bouvard (75020), Dr S. Debray-Meignan (Paris), Dr C. Debure (Issy-les-Moulineaux), Dr P. Dejardin (Paris), Dr M. Dramé (Reims), Prof. P. Fardellone (Amiens), Prof. R. Gonthier (Saint Etienne), Prof. C. Jeandel (Montpellier), Dr S. Liabeuf (Reims), Dr P. Livet (Lyon), Dr E. Maggia (Nîmes), Prof. C. Marcelli (Caen), Dr C. Martin-Hunyadi (Strasbourg), S. Moussay (Caen), Dr V. Poquet (Annecy), Prof. F. Puisieux (Lille), Dr J.P. Taillandier (Villejuif), Prof. J. Weber (Rouen), and Dr Y. Wolmark (Paris), as well as the study coordinators, S. Emprin, G. Gonzalez, and M. Borsato.

Conflict of interest

Drs Castro-Lionard, Dargent-Molina, Fermanian, Gonthier, and Cassou declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this manuscript.

Details of ethics approval

The study protocol was approved by the Ile-de-France IV Committee for the Protection of Persons (CPP) in June 2007 (ref 2007/29). It is registered with the CNIL (French Data Protection Authority) under the number 907198. The study is registered with the French Authority for the Safety of Health Products (AFSSAPS) and on ClinicalTrials.gov under the number NCT00545350. Each woman received written information about the study. Under French law, written consent is not required for this observational study.

Funding

The Ossébo study is supported by the French National Research Agency (ANR), the Hospital Program of Clinical Research (PHRC, French Ministry of Health), the National Institute of Health Prevention and Education (INPES), and the Council of the Ile-de-France region (Citizens and Institutions Partnership for Research and Innovation, PICRI). No funding source intervened in the development or conduct of the study, analysis of the data, writing of the manuscript, or decision to submit for publication.

The interventions were implemented in partnership with the association S.I.E.L. Bleu (Sport, Initiatives and Leisure).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karine Castro-Lionard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castro-Lionard, K., Dargent-Molina, P., Fermanian, C. et al. Use of Calcium Supplements, Vitamin D Supplements and Specific Osteoporosis Drugs Among French Women Aged 75–85 Years: Patterns of Use and Associated Factors. Drugs Aging 30, 1029–1038 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-013-0121-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-013-0121-9

Keywords

Navigation