Abstract
Objectives
To examine the association between body mass index (BMI) and obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.
Methods
We conducted a cohort study comparing prepregnant BMI categories with obstetrical and neonatal outcomes using the McGill Obstetrical and Neonatal Database on all deliveries in 10 year period (1987–1997). Prepregnant BMI was categorized into underweight (<20), normal (20–24.9), overweight (25–29.9), obese (30–39.9), and morbidly obese (40+). Logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for age, smoking, parity, and preexisting diabetes using normal BMI as the reference.
Results
The population consisted of underweight 4,312 (23.1%), normal weight 10,021 (53.8%), overweight 3,069 (16.5%), obese 1,137 (6.1%), and morbidly obese 104 (0.6%). As compared to women with normal BMIs, overweight, obese, and morbidly obese women had an increased risk of preeclampsia 2.28 (1.88–2.77), 4.65 (3.71–5.83), 6.26 (3.48–11.26); gestational hypertension 1.56 (1.35–1.81), 2.01 (1.64–2.45), 2.77 (1.60–4.78); gestational diabetes 1.89 (1.63–2.19), 3.22 (2.68–3.87), 4.71 (2.89–7.67); preterm birth 1.20 (1.04–1.38), 1.60 (1.32–1.94), 2.43 (1.46–4.05); cesarean section 1.48 (1.35–1.62), 1.85 (1.62–2.11), 2.92 (1.97–4.34); and macrosomia 1.66 (1.23–2.24), 2.32 (1.58–3.41), 2.10 (0.64–6.86). Underweight women were less likely to have: preeclampsia 0.67 (0.52–0.86), gestational hypertension 0.71 (0.60–0.83), gestational diabetes 0.82 (0.69–0.97), cesarean section 0.89 (0.81–0.97), shoulder dystocia 0.88 (0.80–0.96), birth injuries 0.40 (0.21–0.77), and macrosomia 0.43 (0.28–0.68) but more likely to have small for gestational age infants 1.54 (1.37–1.72) and intrauterine growth restricted infants 1.33 (1.07–1.67).
Conclusion
In a large Canadian teaching hospital, increasing prepregnancy BMI category was associated with an increasing risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Underweight prepregnancy BMI was associated with a reduced risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wilding J (1997) Science, medicine, and the future: obesity treatment. BMJ 315:997–1000
Jung RT (1997) Obesity as a disease. Br Med Bull 53:307–321
Allison DB, Saunders SE (2000) Obesity in North America: an overview. Med Clin North Am 84:305–332
Bianco AT, Smilen SW, Davis Y, Lopez S, Lapinski R, Lockwood CJ (1998) Pregnancy outcome and weight gain recommendations for the morbidly obese women. Obstet Gynecol 97:97–102
De Groot LC (1999) High maternal body weight and pregnancy outcome. Nutr Rev 57:62–64
Sebire NJ (2001) Is maternal underweight really a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome? A population-based study in London. BJOG 108:61–66
Cnattingius S, Bergstrom R, Lipworth L, Kramer MS (1998) Prepregnancy weight and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 338:147–152
Bowers J (1999) Obesity and related pregnancy complications in an inner-city clinic. J Perinatol 19:216–219
Michlin R (2000) Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome. Isr Med Assoc J 2:10–13
Usher R, McLean F (1969) Intrauterine growth of live born Caucasian infants at sea level; Standards obtained from measurements in 7 dimensions of infants born between 25 and 44 weeks’gestation. J Pediatr 74:901
National Heart, Lung, Blood Institute Obesity Education Initiative Expert Panel (1998) Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report. Obes Res 6(Suppl 2):51S–209S
Hortobagyi T, Israel RG, O’Brien KF (1994) Sensitivity and specificity of the Quetelet index to assess obesity in men and women. Eur J Clin Nutr 48:369–375
Heymsfield SB, Allison DB, Heshka S, Pierson RN Jr (1995) Assessment of human body composition. In: Allison DB (ed) Handbook of assessment methods for eating behavior and weight related problems: measures, theory, and research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 515–560
Gallagher D, Visser M, Sepulveda D, Pierson RN, Harris T, Heymsfield SB (1996) How useful is body mass index for comparison of body fatness across age, sex, and ethnic groups. Am J Epidemiol 143:228–239
Troiano RP, Frongillo EA, Sobal J, Levstsky DA (1996) The relationship between body weight and mortality: a quantitative analysis of combined information from existing studies. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 20:63–75
Wolfe HM, Zador IE, Gross TL, Martier SS, Sokol RJ (1991) The clinical utility of maternal body mass index in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 164:1306–1310
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abenhaim, H.A., Kinch, R.A., Morin, L. et al. Effect of prepregnancy body mass index categories on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 275, 39–43 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0219-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0219-y