Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and unenhanced proton MR imaging compared with CT pulmonary angiography in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

  • Magnetic Resonance
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) and the added benefit of unenhanced proton MR angiography compared with CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in patients with chronic thromboembolic disease (CTE).

Methods

A 2 year retrospective study of 53 patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension who underwent CTPA and MRI for suspected pulmonary hypertension and a control group of 36 patients with no CT evidence of pulmonary embolism. The MRI was evaluated for CTE and the combined diagnostic accuracy of ce-MRA and unenhanced proton MRA was determined. CE-MRA generated lung perfusion maps were also assessed.

Results

The overall sensitivity and specificity of CE-MRA in diagnosing proximal and distal CTE were 98% and 94%, respectively. The sensitivity improved from 50% to 88% for central vessel disease when CE-MRA images were analysed with unenhanced proton MRA. The CE-MRA identified more stenoses (29/18), post-stenosis dilatation (23/7) and occlusions (37/29) compared with CTPA. The CE-MRA perfusion images showed a sensitivity of 92% for diagnosing CTE.

Conclusion

CE-MRA has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing CTE. The sensitivity of CE-MRA for visualisation of adherent central and lobar thrombus significantly improves with the addition of unenhanced proton MRA which delineates the vessel wall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Riedel M, Stanek V, Widimsky J, Prerovsky I (1982) Longterm follow-up of patients with pulmonary thromboembolism. Late prognosis and evolution of hemodynamic and respiratory data. Chest 81:151–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moser KM, Bloor CM (1993) Pulmonary vascular lesions occurring in patients with chronic major vessel thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Chest 103:685–692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pengo V, Lensing AW, Prins MH et al (2004) Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 350:2257–2264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wartski M, Collignon MA (2000) Incomplete recovery of lung perfusion after 3 months in patients with acute pulmonary embolism treated with antithrombotic agents. THESEE Study Group. Tinzaparin ou Heparin Standard: Evaluation dans l’Embolie Pulmonaire Study. J Nucl Med 41:1043–1048

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Remy-Jardin M, Louvegny S, Remy J et al (1997) Acute central thromboembolic disease: posttherapeutic follow-up with spiral CT angiography. Radiology 203:173–180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ribeiro A, Lindmarker P, Johnsson H, Juhlin-Dannfelt A, Jorfeldt L (1999) Pulmonary embolism: one-year follow-up with echocardiography doppler and five-year survival analysis. Circulation 99:1325–1330

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Daily PO, Johnston GG, Simmons CJ, Moser KM (1980) Surgical management of chronic pulmonary embolism: surgical treatment and late results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 79:523–531

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jamieson SW, Auger WR, Fedullo PF et al (1993) Experience and results with 150 pulmonary thromboendarterectomy operations over a 29-month period. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 106:116–126, discussion 126–117

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kauczor HU, Schwickert HC, Mayer E, Schweden F, Schild HH, Thelen M (1994) Spiral CT of bronchial arteries in chronic thromboembolism. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18:855–861

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wittram C, Kalra MK, Maher MM, Greenfield A, McLoud TC, Shepard JA (2006) Acute and chronic pulmonary emboli: angiography-CT correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:S421–S429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Wattinne L, Giraud F (1992) Central pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single-breath-hold technique–comparison with pulmonary angiography. Radiology 185:381–387

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kreitner KF, Kunz RP, Ley S et al (2007) Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension—assessment by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 17:11–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kreitner KF, Ley S, Kauczor HU et al (2004) Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: pre- and postoperative assessment with breath-hold MR imaging techniques. Radiology 232:535–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lisbona R, Kreisman H, Novales-Diaz J, Derbekyan V (1985) Perfusion lung scanning: differentiation of primary from thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. AJR Am J Roentgenol 144:27–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ryan KL, Fedullo PF, Davis GB, Vasquez TE, Moser KM (1988) Perfusion scan findings understate the severity of angiographic and hemodynamic compromise in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Chest 93:1180–1185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stein PD, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A et al (1992) Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 85:462–468

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bergin CJ, Sirlin CB, Hauschildt JP et al (1997) Chronic thromboembolism: diagnosis with helical CT and MR imaging with angiographic and surgical correlation. Radiology 204:695–702

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schwickert HC, Schweden F, Schild HH et al (1994) Pulmonary arteries and lung parenchyma in chronic pulmonary embolism: preoperative and postoperative CT findings. Radiology 191:351–357

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ley S, Grunig E, Kiely DG, van Beek E, Wild J (2010) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of pulmonary hypertension: pulmonary vessels and right ventricle. J Magn Reson Imaging 32:1313–1324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sergiacomi G, Bolacchi F, Cadioli M et al (2010) Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: 3D time-resolved MR angiographic evaluation of pulmonary arterial mean transit time and time to peak enhancement. Radiology 254:601–608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ohno Y, Hatabu H, Murase K et al (2007) Primary pulmonary hypertension: 3D dynamic perfusion MRI for quantitative analysis of regional pulmonary perfusion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:48–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ley S, Kreitner KF, Morgenstern I, Thelen M, Kauczor HU (2002) Bronchopulmonary shunts in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: evaluation with helical CT and MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1209–1215

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jahnke C, Paetsch I, Schnackenburg B et al (2004) Coronary MR angiography with steady-state free precession: individually adapted breath-hold technique versus free-breathing technique. Radiology 232:669–676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Deshpande VS, Shea SM, Laub G, Simonetti OP, Finn JP, Li D (2001) 3D magnetization-prepared true-FISP: a new technique for imaging coronary arteries. Magn Reson Med 46:494–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hui BK, Noga ML, Gan KD, Wilman AH (2005) Navigator-gated three-dimensional MR angiography of the pulmonary arteries using steady-state free precession. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:831–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ley S, Kauczor HU, Heussel CP et al (2003) Value of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and helical CT angiography in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Eur Radiol 13:2365–2371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors S.R. and D.C. are funded by Pfizer and Bayer respectively through unrestricted research grants. The UK EPSRC (J.M.W.) and the Sheffield Cardio Vascular Biomedical Research Unit (A.J.S.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Smitha Rajaram.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rajaram, S., Swift, A.J., Capener, D. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and unenhanced proton MR imaging compared with CT pulmonary angiography in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Eur Radiol 22, 310–317 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2252-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2252-x

Keywords

Navigation