Table 4

 Comparison of strategies to identify women at risk of diagnosis of ovarian cancer in next two years based on validation cohort

CriteriaRisk threshold (%)True negative*False negative*False positive*True positive*Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)Positive predictive value (%)Negative predictive value (%)
Family history of ovarian cancerNA470 593527983112.099.81.199.9
Rectal bleedingNA461 28152710 295112.097.80.199.9
Postmenopausal bleedingNA463 6244897 952499.198.30.699.9
Abdominal painNA417 60927253 96726649.488.60.599.9
Abdominal distensionNA469 3124962 264427.899.51.899.9
Appetite lossNA469 5725272 004112.099.60.599.9
Weight lossNA466 4305165 146224.198.90.499.9
Any of six above symptoms†NA390 84215180 73438771.982.90.5100.0
Top 10% risk0.2427 98219843 59434063.290.80.8100.0
Top 5% risk0.5450 71931120 85722742.295.61.199.9
Top 1% risk0.7468 08446334927513.999.32.199.9
Top 0.5% risk1.4469 79047917865911.099.63.299.9
Top 0.1% risk2.3471 214517362213.999.95.599.9

NA=not applicable.

*True negative=criterion not met, does not have disease; false negative=criterion not met, does have disease; false positive=criteria met, does not have disease; true positive=criterion met and has disease.

†This would include 17.2% of all women.