Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Please remember to credit the BMJ as source when publicising
an
article and to tell your readers that they can read its full text on
the
journal's web site (http://bmj.com).
If your story is posted on a website please include a link back to
the source BMJ article (URL's are given under titles).
(Car colour and risk of car crash
injury: population
based case control study)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/327/7429/1455
Silver cars are less likely to be involved
in a crash
resulting in serious injury than cars
of other colours,
finds a study in this week's Christmas
issue of the BMJ.
Researchers in New Zealand examined the
effect of car
colour on the risk of a serious injury
in over 1,000
drivers who took part in the Auckland
car crash injury
study between 1998 and 1999.
Factors that could affect the results,
such as age and sex
of driver, seat belt use, vehicle age,
and road
conditions, were taken into account.
They found a significant reduction (about
50%) in the
risk of serious injury in silver cars
compared with white
cars.
There was a significantly increased risk
of a serious
injury in brown vehicles and the risks
for black and
green cars were also raised. The risk
of a serious injury
in yellow, grey, red, and blue cars was
not significantly
different from that in white cars.
Some limitations mean that the extent to
which these
results are applicable to other settings
is open to
question, say the authors. However, increasing
the
proportion of silver cars could be an
effective strategy
to reduce the burden of injury from car
crashes.
Contact:
Sue Furness, Research Fellow, School of
Population Health, University of Auckland,
New
Zealand
Email: s.furness{at}auckland.ac.nz
(2) The BMJ guide to wickedness
(Snakes, ladders, and spin)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/327/7429/1436
• Need tips on "sexing up" poor
performance data to
meet government targets?
• Want advice to guarantee your
dodgy drug sells like
hot cakes?
• Or are you simply after ways
to make a dubious but
compelling submission to NICE?
Several articles in this week's Christmas
issue of the
BMJ offer a comprehensive guide for the
corrupt and
incompetent.
The first study shows how performance targets
encourage gaming and "creative accounting"
of data.
The authors describe how to manipulate
hospital waiting
times and suggests that position in league
tables may
also be improved by various gaming strategies
to reduce
hospital death rates.
On a serious note, this review highlights
some dilemmas
faced by those under pressure to ensure
that healthcare
providers conform to performance targets,
say the
authors.
In a second article, researchers decide
to cash in their
reputations by setting up a new company,
HARLOT
plc, that guarantees to maximise the profits
of
manufacturers of dodgy drugs, devices,
and useless
screening tests.
They offer to "cook the data" to protect
worthless
products and provide "an array of aftercare
services"
for keeping the truth from interfering
with sales. "If you
faithfully follow our advice, your drug
should sell like hot
cakes," they promise.
In the final article, researchers examine
some of the
more dubious techniques that can be used
by
organisations to make their products seem
more
attractive when being assessed by the
National Institute
for Clinical Excellence (NICE).
These include selectively reporting the
most favourable
evidence and analysing the results in
a way that favours
the product. Producers and users of health
technology
assessments need to be aware of these
potential biases,
they say.
Contacts:
[Performance targets] David Pitches,
Specialist Registrar, University of Birmingham,
UK
Email: d.w.pitches{at}bham.ac.uk
[HARLOT plc] via Emma Dickinson, BMJ Press
Officer, London, UK
Email: edickinson{at}bmj.com
[NICE] Amanda Burls, Senior Clinical Lecturer,
University of Birmingham, UK
Email: a.j.Burls{at}bham.ac.uk
(3) Does birth order
among siblings decide position in
soccer?
(Football position and atopy: both
subject to the birth
order effect?)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/327/7429/1473
Fathers everywhere will be relieved to
know that, when
it comes to playing football, the youngest
in the family
will not always be nominated the goalkeeper
and the
eldest the striker.
In this week's Christmas issue of the BMJ,
Michael
Perkin, a child health specialist and
father of three young
boys, wrote to all 24 clubs in the Nationwide
Division
Three. Fourteen clubs replied, supplying
siblings details
of 232 players (23 goalkeepers, 72 defenders,
68
midfielders, and 69 forwards).
Family size varied significantly by football
position. The
average number of siblings of a goalkeeper
was 1.1,
defender 1.8, midfield 2.4, and forward
2.0. However,
forwards were less likely, not more likely,
to be eldest
siblings.
One explanation for goalkeepers being from
smaller
families may be that in such families
individual children
spend longer in goal, whereas children
in bigger families
can rotate through other positions, suggests
the author.
Overall, it seems safe to conclude that
male siblings
should not be dissuaded from adopting
any football
position that appeals to them, he says.
Contact:
Michael Perkin, Clinical Lecturer, Department
of Child Health, St George's Hospital
Medical School,
London, UK
Email: m.perkin{at}sghms.ac.uk
(4) Titanic survivors lived no longer than general population
(How long did their hearts go on?
A Titanic study)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/327/7429/1457
In the closing song of the 1997 film Titanic,
the heroine
tells us that her heart "must go on and
on" but a study in
this week's Christmas issue of the BMJ
shows that
Titanic survivors lived no longer than
the general
population.
Using passenger biographies from the
Encyclopedia-Titanica website, researchers
compared
the proportion of survivors alive at each
anniversary of
the sinking with two matched groups from
the United
States and Sweden.
Of the 500 passengers listed as survivors,
435 could be
traced. The longevity of these passengers
was not
remarkably different from that of the
two comparison
groups. On average they lived 1.7 years
longer than the
general population of the United States
and 0.5 years
longer than that of Sweden.
Five women lived past 100, and the three
survivors still
alive are now in their 90s. Despite their
higher
socioeconomic status, male passengers
in first class did
not outlive similar age males in the general
populations.
The Titanic survivors did not have shorter
lifespans than
the general population. Nor did they substantially
outlive
them, conclude the authors.
Contact:
James Hanley, Department of Epidemiology,
Biostatistics, and Occupational Health,
McGill
University, Montreal, Canada
Email: james.hanley{at}McGill.ca
(5) Nurses wash their hands more often than doctors
(Audit of soap usage by a primary
care team)
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/327/7429/1453
Nurses are more conscientious handwashers
than
doctors, finds a study in this week's
Christmas issue of
the BMJ. Hand washing is a quick, cheap
and easy way
of preventing the spread of infection.
Identical soap dispensers were installed
next to the
sinks in the consulting room of each member
of a
primary care surgery in Cardiff (two nurses
and three
doctors).
The soap dispensers were all filled to
the same level on
the same day at the start of the study.
Over one year,
the amount of soap used and the number
of
consultations for each member of the team
were
recorded to calculate the ratio of handwashes
to
patients seen.
Nursing staff showed greater attention
to personal
hygiene than doctors. The best performing
nurse
washed her hands at least twice as often
(or twice as
thoroughly) as the best performing doctor.
These results will not necessarily reflect
handwashing
practices in all teams but form a basis
on which others
may conduct similar audits, suggests the
author. At the
Christmas party, guess who will be serving
the cake ?.
Contact:
Alan Stone, General Practitioner, Canna
Surgery, Cardiff, Wales
Email: alan_stone{at}btinternet.com
FOR ACCREDITED JOURNALISTS
Embargoed press releases and articles are available from:
Public Affairs Division
BMA House
Tavistock Square
London WC1H 9JR
(contact: pressoffice{at}bma.org.uk)
and from:
the EurekAlert website, run by the American
Association for the
Advancement of Science
(http://www.eurekalert.org)