Register for free services | Subscribe | Sign In

Quantitative systematic review of randomised controlled trials comparing antibiotic with placebo for acute cough in adults

Tom Fahey, Nigel Stocks, Toby Thomas

Toby Thomas died in a road traffic accident on 25 November 1996

Abstract

Objectives: To assess whether antibiotic treatment for acute cough is effective and to measure the side effects of such treatment.

The data below is exclusive to the BMJ website and did not appear in the printed version of the BMJ:

Table 1 - Losses to follow up in antibiotic and placebo arms of randomised controlled trials included in systematic review
Reference* Losses to follow up (%) Antibiotic Placebo Overall Antibiotic (dose) Outcome measured** Trial quality Trial favours antibiotic?
Stott and West(21) 2 3 2 Doxycycline
(100 mg bid on day 1, then one daily)
1, 2, 3 8 No
Franks and Gleiner(22) 26 12 19 Co-trimoxazole
(trimethoprom/sulphamethoxazole 160/800 mg bid)
3 9 Yes
Williamson(23) 5 9 7 Doxycycline
(100 mg tid on day 1, then one daily)
1, 2 9 No
Brickfield et al(24) 4 4 4 Erythromycin
(enteric coated, 333 mg tid)
2, 3 9 No
Dunlay et al(25) 34 23 29 Erythromycin (enteric coated, 333 mg tid) 1, 2, 3 9 Yes
Verheij et al(26) 8 10 9 Doxycycline
(100 mg bid on day 1, then one daily)
1, 2, 3 11 Yes
King et al(27) 16 26 21 Erythromycin
(250 mg qid)
1, 3 7 No
Scherl et al(28) DK DK 15 Doxycycline
(100 mg bid on day 1, then one daily)
4 8 No
M Stephenson (unpublished data) 0 0 0 Co-trimoxazole
(dosage not stated)
1 9 No
DK=don't know, bid=twice daily, tid=thrice daily, qid=four times daily.
*The reference numbers are the same as those in the version published in the journal.
**=Proportion of subjects with productive cough, 2=proportion who did not improve clinically, 3=proportion reporting side effects of treatment, 4=mean number of days off work (not included in meta-analysis).

Table 2 - Characteristics of patients enrolled in selected randomised controlled clinical trials. included in systematic review
Reference* Diagnosis in title Age range (years) % of eligible patients randomised Smokers included? % Stated that abnormal chest signs excluded? Abnormal chest signs reported at randomisation? % Placebo event rate (95% CI)** Day of assessment
Stott and West(21) Cough and purulent sputum >14 95 Yes; unknown Yes, "abnormal clinical signs of auscultation" Not reported (1) 31% (22% to 40%); (2) 17% (9% to 24%) 7
Franks and Gleiner(22) Acute bronchitis >14 Not reported Yes; 43% (A), 60% (P) Yes, "clinical evidence of pneumonitis," but not qualified Yes; wheeze/rhonchi present in 13% (A), 16% (P) Average number of days reported (see text) 7
Williamson(23) Acute bronchitis 21-65 80 Yes; 31% (A), 34% (P) Yes, "signs of consolidation on examination" Yes; rhonchi on examination in 27% (A), 27% (P) (1) 55% (37% to 74%); (2) 33% (19% to 53%) (1) 10; (2) 7-10**
Brickfield et al(24) Acute bronchitis 18-65 30 Yes; 50% (A), 42% (P) Yes, "evidence of pneumonia on chest x ray or examination" Not reported (2) 42% (22% to 63%) 8
Dunlay et al(25) Acute bronchitis >18 20 Yes; 34% (A), 42% (P) Yes, "clinical evidence of an infection" Yes; abnormal results on lung examnation in 16% (A), 19% (P) (1) 71% (49% to 87%); (2) 29% (11% to 52%) 10
Verheij et al(26) Acute cough and purulent sputum >18 76 Yes; 53% (A), 52% (P) Yes, pneumonia defined as severe dyspnoea and crackles Yes; ausculatory abnormalities (rhonchi or course crackles) in 28% (A), 35% (P) (1) 22% (13% to 54%); (2) 24% (14% to 35%) 11
King et al(27) Acute bronchitis >8 65 Yes; 31% (A), 38% (P) Partly, excluded localised crackles/wheezes, included diffuse crackles/wheezes Yes; diffuse or intermittant rales, rhonchi, or wheeze in 39% (A), 55% (P) (1) 87% (70% to 96%) 10
Scherl et al(28) Acute bronchitis >12 Not reported Yes; 50% (A), 27% (P) Partly, patients with fever or crepitations had chest radiography and were excluded with evidence Not reported Not reported Not reported
M Stephenson (unpublished data) Upper respiratory tract infection 16-70 Not reported Yes; 29% (A), 39% (P) Not reported Yes; abnormal chest signs in 7.8% (A), 5% (P) (1) 33% (23% to 44%) 7
A=antibiotic, P=placebo.
*The reference numbers are the same as those in the version published in the journal.
**=Productive cough present, 2=Not improved clinically.

Additional references to quasi-randomised controlled trials in adults, and other references found during search conducted for systematic review of acute cough

1 Kaiser L, Lew D, Hirschel B, Auckenthaler R, Morabia A, Heald A, et al. Effects of antibiotic treatment in the subset of common-cold patients who have bacteria in nasopharyngeal secretions. Lancet 1996;347: 1507-10.

2 Gordon M, Lovell S, Dugdale A. The value of antibiotics in minor respiratory illness in children. Med J Aust 1974;1:304-6.

3 Lexomboon U, Duangmani C, Kusalasai V, Sunakorn P, Olson L C, Noyes H E. Evaluation of orally administered antibiotics for treatment of upper respiratory infections in Thai children. J Pediatr 1971;78:772-8.

4 Taylor B, Abbott G D, Kerr M McK, Fergusson D M. Amoxycillin and co-trimoxazole in presumed viral respiratory infections of childhood: placebo-controlled trial. BMJ 1977;ii:552- 4.

5 Fraser P K, Hatch L A, Hughes K E A. A comparison between aspirin and antibiotics in the treatment of minor respiratory infections. Lancet 1962;i:614-7.

6 Hardy L M, Traisman H S. Antibiotics and chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of uncomplicated respiratory infections in children. J Pediatr 1956;48:146-56.

7 Townsend E H, Radebaugh J F. Prevention of complications of respiratory illnesses in pediatric practice. N Engl J Med 1962;266:683-9.

8 Wynn-Williams N. Control of respiratory infections in children by tetracycline. BMJ 1961;1:469-70.

9 Sutrisna B, Frerichs R R, Reingold A L. Randomised controlled trial of effectiveness of ampicillin in mild acute repiratory infections in Indonesian children. Lancet 1991;338:471-4.

10 Haight T H, Kahn F H, Ziegra S R. Efficacy of erythromycin in the treatment of acute respiratory infections. US Armed Forces Med J 1954;5:1405-22.

11 Hoaglund R J, Dietz E N, Myers P W, Costand H C. Aureomycin in the treatment of the common cold. N Engl J Med 1950;243:773-5.

12 Jones P H, Bigham R, Manning P R. Use of antibiotics in nonbacterial respiratory infections. JAMA 1953;99:262-4.

13 Gottfarb P, Brauner A. Children with persistent cough‹outcome with treatment and role of Moraxella catarrhalis? Scand J Infect Dis 1994;26:545-51.

14 Townsend E H. Chemoprophylaxis during respiratory infection in private practice. Am J Dis Child 1960;34:566-73.

15 Ackerman B. Treatment of undifferentiated respiratory infections in infants. Clin Ped 1968;7:391-5.

16 Todd J K, Todd N, Damato J, Todd W. Bacteriology and treatment of purulent nasopharyngitis: a double blind, placebo-controlled evaluation. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1984;3:226-32.

17 Ritchie J M. Antibiotics in small doses for the common cold. Lancet 1958;i:618-21.

18 Cecil R L, Plummer N, Smillie W G. Sulfadiasine in treatment of common cold. JAMA 1944;124:8-14.

19 Lerro S J, Rapalski A T, Schmerer F. Therapeutic comparison between aureomycin and APC in clinical influenza. US Armed Forces Med J 1958;9:479-86.

20 McKerrow C B, Oldham P D, Thomson S. Antibiotics for the common cold. Lancet 1961;i:185-7.

21 Thalman W G, Kempe C, Worrall J A, Meiklejohn G. Aureomycin in treatment of influenza: controlled study. JAMA 1950;144:1156-7.

22 Rusk H A, Van Raversway A C. Sulfadiasine in respiratory tract infection. JAMA 1943;122:495-6.

23 Darelid J, Lofgren S, Malmvall B. Erythromycin treatment is beneficial for longstanding Moraxella catarrhalis associated cough in children. Scand J Infect Dis 1993;25:323-9.

24 McLane R A. Clinical evaluation of combined drug therapy in acute respiratory infections. Journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey 1952;49:509-10.