Research
Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: systematic review and meta-analysis
BMJ 2012; 345 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4692 (Published 24 July 2012) Cite this as: BMJ 2012;345:e4692Data supplement
Web Extra
Extra material supplied by the author
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Data Supplement - Web figure 1: Results of a systematic search conducted to identify replication studies of nine commonly used risk assessment tools
- Data Supplement - Web figure 2: Distribution of effect sizes (reported as Cohen’s d) in studies included and not included in the current systematic review
- Data Supplement - Web appendix: Studies included in quantitative synthesis
- Data Supplement - Web table 1: Comparison of summary accuracy estimates produced by three types of risk assessment tools when moderate risk individuals were classified as low risk
- Data Supplement - Web table 2: Metaregression analyses within three classes of risk assessment tools
- Data Supplement - Web figure 3: Summary receiver operator characteristic curve from bivariate analysis of individual violence risk assessment tools
- Data Supplement - Web figure 4: Summary receiver operator characteristic curve from bivariate analysis of individual sexual risk assessment tools
- Data Supplement - Web figure 5: Summary receiver operator characteristic curve from bivariate analysis of individual criminal risk assessment tools
Related articles
- Education And Debate Published: 04 September 2003; BMJ 327 doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
- Editorial Published: 08 May 1999; BMJ 318 doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7193.1225
- Correction Published: 21 September 2012; BMJ 345 doi:10.1136/bmj.e6323
- Letter Published: 16 September 2004; BMJ 329 doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7467.684
See more
- Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer in individuals with previous colorectal neoplasia: systematic review and network meta-analysisBMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6188; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6188
- Alpha blockers for treatment of ureteric stones: systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6112; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6112
- Sex based subgroup differences in randomized controlled trials: empirical evidence from Cochrane meta-analysesBMJ November 24, 2016, 355 i5826; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5826
- Association between prediabetes and risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality: systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ November 23, 2016, 355 i5953; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5953
- Effects of ischaemic conditioning on major clinical outcomes in people undergoing invasive procedures: systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ November 07, 2016, 355 i5599; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5599
Cited by...
- An Examination of Predictive Validity and Change in Risk Factors for Stalking over Time
- Calibrating violence risk assessments for uncertainty
- Development and Validation of the Youth Violence Potential Scale
- HCR-20 shows poor field validity in clinical forensic psychiatry settings
- Patient outcomes following discharge from secure psychiatric hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis
- Improving risk assessment in schizophrenia: epidemiological investigation of criminal history factors
- Authors' reply
- Authors' reply
- Violence risk assessment as a medical intervention: ethical tensions
- Rates of violence in patients classified as high risk by structured risk assessment instruments