Editorials

The holy grail of health and social care integration

BMJ 2017; 356 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j801 (Published 16 February 2017) Cite this as: BMJ 2017;356:j801
  1. Jon Glasby, professor of health and social care, and head of the school of social policy
  1. University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT
  1. J.Glasby{at}bham.ac.uk

Cost savings may be hard to identify but the real benefits are human

According to a recent report by the National Audit Office (NAO),1 “nearly 20 years of initiatives to join up health and social care . . . has not led to system-wide integrated services” and “there is no compelling evidence to show that integration leads to sustainable financial savings or reduced hospital activity.”

The only strictly incorrect element in the NAO’s critique is the timeline: we have been trying to integrate care for much longer, going back at least as far as the joint care planning, joint finance, and joint consultative committees of the 1970s. We also saw joint hospital discharge protocols in the 1990s, the growth of multidisciplinary mental health and learning disability teams, national guidance on joint commissioning, pooled budgets, a single assessment for older people, the creation of care trusts (integrated health and social care organisations), and the advent of joint strategic needs assessments—not to mention Labour’s integrated care organisation pilots; the Coalition government’s Better Care Fund, integrated care pioneers, …

View Full Text

Sign in

Log in through your institution

Subscribe