Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users
to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response
is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual
response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the
browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published
online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed.
Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles.
The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being
wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our
attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not
including references and author details. We will no longer post responses
that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
Lock succinctly exposes the blinkered policy making that is blighting the NHS. Even so it worries me that along with most commentators there is only passing allusion to (heaven forbid) the possibility of “reducing standards” to keep us within budget. Have we all become complicit in raising impossible expectations? It’s not just about accessing a health professional 24/7 irrespective of severity, it’s also about fostering the illusion that there is a pill/surgery/treatment “for every ill”, and the sooner one is seen the quicker those “clever doctors” can restore perfect health or if not radically extend longevity. This may not be a popular (populist?) attitude, but having just retired as a Palliative Care doctor, I am very aware that when the chips are down what most patients want is sensitive, time-rich care rather than increasingly redundant and expensive attempts at active therapy. The evidence suggests we routinely exaggerate the benefits over the harms to our patients, but as patients doctors are much more choosy in the treatments we’ll accept.
A further consideration is that we live in a world where for the majority the health benefits we already enjoy are beyond the realm of fantasy. Is it morally right that we invest mega sums on therapies that merely tinker with public health statistics, when we know that by far the biggest drivers of health improvement are lifestyle, nutrition and environment? Isn’t it about time we were honest both with ourselves and the public that much of what we do is of marginal benefit, and that the NHS is living both beyond its means and wasting limited resources?
Re: NHS leaders are failing to “speak truth unto power”
Lock succinctly exposes the blinkered policy making that is blighting the NHS. Even so it worries me that along with most commentators there is only passing allusion to (heaven forbid) the possibility of “reducing standards” to keep us within budget. Have we all become complicit in raising impossible expectations? It’s not just about accessing a health professional 24/7 irrespective of severity, it’s also about fostering the illusion that there is a pill/surgery/treatment “for every ill”, and the sooner one is seen the quicker those “clever doctors” can restore perfect health or if not radically extend longevity. This may not be a popular (populist?) attitude, but having just retired as a Palliative Care doctor, I am very aware that when the chips are down what most patients want is sensitive, time-rich care rather than increasingly redundant and expensive attempts at active therapy. The evidence suggests we routinely exaggerate the benefits over the harms to our patients, but as patients doctors are much more choosy in the treatments we’ll accept.
A further consideration is that we live in a world where for the majority the health benefits we already enjoy are beyond the realm of fantasy. Is it morally right that we invest mega sums on therapies that merely tinker with public health statistics, when we know that by far the biggest drivers of health improvement are lifestyle, nutrition and environment? Isn’t it about time we were honest both with ourselves and the public that much of what we do is of marginal benefit, and that the NHS is living both beyond its means and wasting limited resources?
Competing interests: No competing interests