Views And Reviews Personal View

My mum’s care means that decisions not to resuscitate must now be discussed with patients

BMJ 2017; 356 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j1084 (Published 02 March 2017) Cite this as: BMJ 2017;356:j1084
  1. Kate Masters, relative of patient
  1. Cambridgeshire, UK
  1. katemasters67{at}sky.com

Doctors as well as patients should talk more openly about dying, death, and care at the end of life, says one of Janet Tracey’s daughters, Kate Masters

In March 2011 my mum, Janet Tracey, died in hospital. She’d broken her neck in a car accident; she also had terminal cancer. Care in her final days seemed dictated by a form with a funny acronym: DNACPR, which I now know means “Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation.”

Mum was often intubated and communicated with pen and paper. “Please do not exclude me,” she wrote. Her medical notes recorded that she wanted to be involved in discussions about her care. But, when doctors decided that she would not survive resuscitation, they didn’t discuss it with her. This medical decision was in my mum’s best interests, they told the family. They didn’t mention DNR, DNAR, DNACPR, or the red edged form documenting the decision and conversation.

Mum had already had two failed extubations, and we …

View Full Text

Sign in

Log in through your institution

Subscribe