News
Five minutes with . . . John Ioannidis
BMJ 2016; 354 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5184 (Published 28 September 2016) Cite this as: BMJ 2016;354:i5184- Susan Mayor
- London
“We have an epidemic of deeply flawed meta-analyses, with the number published each year having increased by more than 2600% over the past 20 years, compared with only 50% for research studies of all types listed on PubMed.1
“There is now massive production of unnecessary, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses. While these designs represent the highest level of evidence, they are often massively misused, and …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.