Letters
Prediction models for cardiovascular risk
Author’s reply to Woodward
BMJ 2016; 354 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4485 (Published 16 August 2016) Cite this as: BMJ 2016;354:i4485- Johanna A A G Damen, PhD fellow1 2
- 1Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- 2Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, Str 6.131, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
- j.a.a.damen{at}umcutrecht.nl
We highly appreciate Woodward’s comment on our systematic review of prediction models for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in the general population.1 2 Woodward refers to the development and validation of a relatively new prediction model in this field, Globorisk.
At first sight this is just another development of a model to predict CVD, which can be added to the list of 363 prediction models already described in our systematic review. As already …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.