Author’s reply to WoodwardBMJ 2016; 354 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4485 (Published 16 August 2016) Cite this as: BMJ 2016;354:i4485
- Johanna A A G Damen, PhD fellow1 2
- 1Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- 2Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, Str 6.131, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
We highly appreciate Woodward’s comment on our systematic review of prediction models for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in the general population.1 2 Woodward refers to the development and validation of a relatively new prediction model in this field, Globorisk.
At first sight this is just another development of a model to predict CVD, which can be added to the list of 363 prediction models already described in our systematic review. As already …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial