Editorials

Predicting pulmonary embolus in primary care

BMJ 2015; 351 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4594 (Published 08 September 2015) Cite this as: BMJ 2015;351:h4594
  1. Robert J Dachs, vice-chairman1, clinical associate professor and director of research2
  1. 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Ellis Hospital, Schenectady, NY, USA
  2. 2Ellis Hospital Family Residency Program, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA
  1. dachsmd{at}aol.com

Decision rules supplement but don’t supplant clinical judgment

It is 4 30 pm, and your last patient of the day is a 42 year old woman in excellent health who awoke with pain located in the right infrascapular region that worsens with deep inspiration. She reports no dyspnea, cough, fever, or recent prolonged immobilization. Her vital signs and physical examination are normal. Your initial impression is that some type of musculoskeletal condition is causing her pain. Then you begin to wonder. Could this be a pulmonary embolus? Your gut says “no,” but your brain continues to dwell on this possibility. You contemplate your dilemma and consider two competing options: stick with your impression and treat the patient for presumed muscle pain or send her for an advanced imaging study to rule out a pulmonary embolus.

In a linked paper (doi:10.1136/bmj.h4438), Hendrickson and colleagues attempt to provide a third option for the physician in a primary care office setting.1 Their goal was to find a strategy using clinical decision rules that have been derived and validated in emergency department settings and that could be transported to the primary care setting and allow the safe discharge of a low risk …

View Full Text

Sign in

Log in through your institution

Free trial

Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial

Subscribe