Head To Head

Patient commentary: Direct access would beat receiving test results with the receptionist’s interpretation

BMJ 2015; 350 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h797 (Published 11 February 2015) Cite this as: BMJ 2015;350:h797
  1. Rosamund Snow, patient editor, The BMJ
  1. rsnow{at}bmj.com

The authors on both sides of this debate have made an interesting assumption1: that the opposite of patients’ direct access is a “traditional model,” in which a clinician interprets test results for the patient. To assume that this is the default situation is to miss a vital part of the debate.

In the real world, test results are not just delivered by supportive clinicians, with occasional lapses from that norm; direct access aside, the standard delivery of test results is much more varied than that. I have had results given to me by a general practice receptionist as part …

View Full Text

Sign in

Log in through your institution

Free trial

Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial

Subscribe