Guantanamo force feeding trial: the US is wrong to medicalize hunger strikingBMJ 2015; 350 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h669 (Published 11 February 2015) Cite this as: BMJ 2015;350:h669
- W John Kalk, locum consultant endocrinologist, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, Kent ME7 5NY, UK
- Correspondence to:
In 1998 I was asked by the Johannesburg Hospital to assume responsibility for the medical care of political prisoners admitted because of acute complications of hunger strike. Some 20 detainees, all young black men whom the apartheid government considered a “high security risk,” had been held in so called “preventive detention” by police for up to 32 months, some in solitary confinement.
The hunger strike was their protest against being held without charge under emergency regulations. The police medical services in Johannesburg had been unable to cope with large numbers of increasingly ill prisoners, who were admitted to local hospitals. In the Johannesburg Hospital they were housed in a single ward where they were guarded by heavily armed police and were periodically shackled to their beds. At that time there were some 700 such detainees on hunger strike throughout the country.
Hunger strikers were patients
The ethical and medical principles that we applied in the Johannesburg Hospital in the management of these prisoners have been published.1 2 In essence, they were our patients: the medical and nursing staff agreed to accept …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial