An occult cause of dyspnoea
BMJ 2015; 350 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h2976 (Published 26 June 2015) Cite this as: BMJ 2015;350:h2976- Anthony Simon Bates, academic junior doctor,
- Salem Al-Hamali, consultant endocrine surgeon, surgical director
- Correspondence to: A S Bates anthony.simon.bates{at}gmail.com
A 69 year old man presented with severe dyspnoea. After respiratory arrest and emergency intubation, computed tomography of the neck was performed (fig 1⇓). What is the diagnosis based on the results of computed tomography?
Answer
The diagnosis is compressive cervical goitre.
Discussion
A 69 year old man presented to the emergency department with severe dyspnoea. His medical history included adult onset asthma. Arterial blood gas analysis showed acidosis (pH 7.10), acute type 1 respiratory failure, and a lactate of 5.1 mmol/L. He was treated for an exacerbation of asthma. On the fifth day, his symptoms had not improved, stridor was audible, and he had a respiratory arrest. Computed tomography of the neck was performed (fig 2⇓). A large compressive multinodular thyroid gland was resected. After he recovered from surgery his presenting symptoms resolved.
Upper airway compromise can be demonstrated by peak expiratory flow and the ratio of the peak expiratory flow to the forced expiratory volume in one second when more than 50% of the tracheal area is involved. However, symptoms usually present only when more than 75% of the trachea is occluded.1 2 Thyroid goitre has been reported to be the cause of clinically detectable upper airway obstruction in 33% of these patients.3 Peak expiratory flow will increase after treatment with a bronchodilator in patients without an airway obstructing goitre, so the response to such treatment can differentiate between those with and without a goitre. The possibility of concomitant upper airway compromise on background chronic airflow limitation should be taken into account in the investigation of patients presenting with unremitting dyspnoea.4
Notes
Cite this as: BMJ 2015;350:h2976
Footnotes
Competing interests: None declared.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Patient consent obtained.
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.