Does the UK civil service code stifle reporting on health and science?BMJ 2015; 350 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h2290 (Published 29 April 2015) Cite this as: BMJ 2015;350:h2290
- Ingrid Torjesen, freelance journalist, London
A recent clarification to the UK civil service code, explicitly requiring civil servants to obtain ministerial authorisation before speaking to the media, is threatening journalists’ access to health professionals and scientists who work for government and associated arm’s length bodies, such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
On 1 April the journal Nature ran an editorial arguing, “Any block on transparency and openness is a step backwards” and rallying, “Scientists in the United Kingdom should find their voices again. And governments should not muzzle them.”1
Already relatively quiet
Lawrence McGinty, former health editor at ITV News and chairman of the Medical Journalists’ Association, told The BMJ, “These scientists are already relatively quiet when compared with their colleagues in academia, and any message from on high that is anything other than a clear and full message of support for media engagement risks having a further chilling effect.
“What we need from the next government is a new transparency policy for government scientists, not another secrecy one.”
Journalists rely on experts working within government funded …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial