Feature Sugar Sugar’s web of influence 2: Biasing the science BMJ 2015; 350 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h215 (Published 11 February 2015) Cite this as: BMJ 2015;350:h215 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Feature Sugar’s web of influence 3: Why the responsibility deal is a “dead duck” for sugar reduction Published: 11 February 2015; BMJ 350 doi:10.1136/bmj.h219 Feature Sugar’s web of influence 4: Mars and company: sweet heroes or villains? Published: 11 February 2015; BMJ 350 doi:10.1136/bmj.h220 Feature Commentary: Sweet policies Published: 11 February 2015; BMJ 350 doi:10.1136/bmj.h780 Feature Sugar: spinning a web of influence Published: 11 February 2015; BMJ 350 doi:10.1136/bmj.h231 See more Exclusive: Outcry as Philip Morris International funds smoking cessation courses on Medscape BMJ April 09, 2024, 385 q830; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q830 Delays in dealing with complaints against drug companies are growing, BMJ finds BMJ February 14, 2024, 384 q365; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q365 Lax oversight of semaglutide advertising could harm patients, warn critics BMJ December 13, 2023, 383 p2919; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p2919 Concerns over informed consent for pregnant women in Pfizer’s RSV vaccine trial BMJ November 15, 2023, 383 p2620; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p2620 Trusts are accused of using foreign doctors as “cheap labour” in fellowship schemes BMJ October 25, 2023, 383 p2427; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p2427