Views & Reviews Personal View

Automated alerts for acute kidney injury warrant caution

BMJ 2015; 350 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h19 (Published 07 January 2015) Cite this as: BMJ 2015;350:h19
  1. Simon Sawhney, clinical lecturer in nephrology, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD
  1. simon.sawhney{at}abdn.ac.uk

Moves to improve identification of acute kidney injury are to be welcomed, writes Simon Sawhney—but the diagnostic criteria are vague, and caution is needed in interpreting test results

As an academic renal trainee and apprentice of acute kidney injury (AKI), I have had the privilege of learning my art in parallel with a paradigm shift in diagnosis. In a decade the new term AKI has transformed our awareness of a serious condition that can happen anywhere in the NHS.1 2

AKI is defined by changes in serum creatinine from a previous baseline over a short period (28 μmol/L in 48 hours, or 50% in one week), and it is measured in three stages of severity depending on the magnitude of change. Even small changes in vulnerable patients can signal increased mortality.3 A national inquiry, Adding Insult to Injury, reminds us that late intervention can lead to preventable death, and we could all do better in our efforts to provide prompt and safe care.4 But our …

View Full Text

Sign in

Log in through your institution

Free trial

Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial

Subscribe