Letters Assisted Dying Bill

Widening the net of assisted suicide to vulnerable people

BMJ 2014; 349 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4967 (Published 05 August 2014) Cite this as: BMJ 2014;349:g4967
  1. Sameer Mallick, Medical Research Council clinical research training fellow in otolaryngology1
  1. 1University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
  1. a.s.mallick{at}sheffield.ac.uk

Although the idea of performing assisted death without the person’s consent may seem absurd, this has occasionally occurred in Belgium and the Netherlands.1 2 Furthermore, Belgium has recently passed a law legalising euthanasia for terminally ill children without any age limit.3 This is precisely the slippery slope that those against assisted suicide worry about. Although The BMJ’s editors naively play this down in their support for the Assisted Dying Bill,4 the experience of our European neighbours suggests that widening the net of assisted suicide to vulnerable people at some point in the future already has a precedent.

Furthermore, there are many examples of a statute being introduced for a particular purpose, only for it to be manipulated and misused in later years. Take the Terrorism Act 2000, which was also introduced by Lord Falconer. When David Miranda was detained in Britain under Schedule 7 of the act, Falconer himself stated: “I am very clear that this does not apply, either on its terms or in its spirit, to Mr Miranda.”5 Whereas this misapplication of anti-terror legislation resulted in a brief inconvenience to an individual, the misapplication of the assisted suicide bill would have far more serious consequences—the unnecessary loss of human life.

Notes

Cite this as: BMJ 2014;349:g4967

Footnotes

References

View Abstract

Sign in

Log in through your institution

Free trial

Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial

Subscribe