Letters
NNTs in chronic disease
NNT is highly misleading when assessing chronic disease prevention
BMJ 2014; 349 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4167 (Published 15 July 2014) Cite this as: BMJ 2014;349:g4167- Timo E Strandberg, professor1
- 1Universities of Helsinki and Oulu, PO Box 22, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
- timo.strandberg{at}oulu.fi
The use of absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat (NNT) instead of relative risk reduction (RRR) has been advocated when communicating the effect of various treatments to patients.1 2 However, the use of NNT in the prevention of chronic disease may be highly misleading and may underestimate long term benefits.
In a hypothetical primary prevention trial …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.