The joy of cochlear implants
BMJ 2014; 348 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2019 (Published 18 March 2014) Cite this as: BMJ 2014;348:g2019All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
Dear Sir
I commend Professor Ibrahim on his honest and interesting article about cochlear implants and I agree with Professor Niparko's comments. My son was born hearing and at the age of one year, he survived that dreaded of all illnesses, meningitis, but was left profoundly deaf. As parents we turned to deaf groups for support, but found many dismissive of the benefits of implants, being accussed by one of "robbing our society of another member". Nonetheless we persevered and at 18 months my son received bilateral implants. The journey has been hard, our house was a speech therapist's dream for several years, and even now at the age of 7 he needs ongoing support. However, our house is now never silent, he attends mainstream school and in spite of being told that implants will mean he will never be able to play sports because they get in the way, he is a skateboarding, climbing and rugby playing fanatic! The only thing he cannot do is sing in perfect tune, but then neither can his parents!
There is no doubt that the decision to have a child implanted is a difficult one, and you cannot underestimate the commitment required in teaching a child to use them, but the journey is worth it. If in the future our son wishes to remain deaf, he can simply take off his implants, but at present he would not be without them. The only time we can remove them is when he has fallen asleep and if he wakes in the night the first thing he does is put them back on. It is therefore refreshing to see cochlear implants gaining popularity, especially now amongst adults, and technology keeps on improving. I said to my son the other day, "Can you hear that birdsong" to which he replied, "What, the blackbird?"
Competing interests: No competing interests
Sir, I commend Prof Ibrahim on his most candid description of his journey from hearing loss to restoration with the use of a truly transformative technology in the form of the cochlear implant. I can attest to this , as a General Practitioner I would have been quite unable to return to practice 4yrs ago without the benefit of this device . The quality of hearing afforded from the device, to someone with severe to profound hearing loss, quite exceeds that, and is far more natural than anything provided by attempts at amplification of residual cochlear hair cells with even the best digital hearing aid.
Sadly, as Prof Ibrahim implies, there is a significant underutilisation of this device. This has been highlighted recently with the launch of a report (1) following on a conference hosted by the UK charity, The Ear Foundation 'Adult Hearing Loss- time for a new approach' in Westminster on 15th October 2013.
Whilst there are approximately 250,000 CI users throughout the world, with over 5000 users within the UK, there is much evidence that perhaps only approximately 5% of the adult population in the UK with severe to profound hearing loss have benefitted from these devices (2).
The reasons for this are complex and are in part due to a significant lack of knowledge and understanding of these devices by General Practitioners and even audiologists, with poor onward referral to specialist centres, together with the use of somewhat outdated NICE guidance , which is used for justification for cochlear implantation within the UK .
This was also highlighted when MP ,Lilian Greenwood ,sought an adjournment debate in the UK Westminster Parliament recently on the 12th November 2013 and met with cross party support to seek a re-examination of the evidence from NICE for the greater use of CI both by extending its usage to those individuals not currently covered by the NICE criteria ,but suffering significant functional impairment and also requesting examination of the case for bilateral implantation in adults ,as is currently offered in the childhood profoundly hearing impaired population.
Whilst the cost of the CI is significant, the economic benefit is likely to be greater. Of the 300,000 people of working age with severe hearing impairment in the UK, 20% report that they are unemployed and are seeking work. Another 10% report that they cannot seek work as a result of their condition (4). As the state pension age rises and more jobs depend on communication skills than was the case 20 or 30 years ago, that vulnerability to unemployment is a growing problem which may in part be reversed by cochlear implantation.
1.
www.earfoundation.org.uk/files/download/667
2.
Raine, C. (2013) Cochlear Implants in the UK: awareness and utilisation. Cochlear Implants International Supplement 1, vol14. S32-S37.
4.
Shield, B, ‘Evaluation of the social and economic costs of hearing impairment’. A report for Hear-It AISBL, 2006.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Readers of this article may find the following links useful.
UKHPHL http://hphl.org.uk/ has an online email group where health professionals (not just in the UK) can share experience and get each others advice about how to handle a career when your hearing is impaired.
AMPHL http://www.amphl.org/ is a similar site based in the USA.
For those of us who are just starting down the pathway of losing our hearing, there is a great deal of reliable information and recent research on the Action on Hearing Loss (formerly RNID) website http://www.actiononhearingloss.org.uk/
If you are starting to think you may be losing some hearing, try the screening test on the Action on Hearing Loss website.
A key message is that dealing with our hearing loss early conveys considerable benefits, not least making it easier to adapt to hearing aids.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Re: The joy of cochlear implants
I read Professor Ibrahim’s article on hearing loss and cochlear implantation with great enjoyment. As someone in a similar line of work who also lost their hearing in adulthood and is now a cochlear implant recipient, it was wonderful to read such an articulate account in which so much was recognisable to me. Whilst I suspect that a formal study along the lines of “The Epidemiology of Epidemiologists with Cochlear Implants” would ultimately founder under sample size considerations, I find it interesting to consider one aspect where our experience diverged.
It seems to me that if you lose your hearing in adulthood and don’t fancy the idea of hiding away from other people forever, sooner or later you’ll be compelled to choose between one of two strategies. Will you be a nodder-and-smiler or a collar-grabber?
The nodder-and-smiler is hoping to “pass” as a hearing person: if they can’t follow the conversation, they just keep quiet and hope no-one will notice. The collar-grabber, on the other hand, will tell any passing stranger about their hearing loss and is forthright about expressing their communication needs. Professor Ibrahim, I deduce, is a nodder-and-smiler; I on the other hand am a confirmed collar-grabber and will explain interesting facts about lip reading to anyone who stands still for long enough.
Choosing a strategy is necessary because oddly, given that hearing loss is such a common problem, people won’t guess that you’re deaf until you tell them. Highly-trained experts such as one’s spouse can see through the nodding-and-smiling facade at fifty paces, but new acquaintances are extraordinarily slow to cotton on. When people detect that you’re not responding completely appropriately to what they’ve said, almost the last explanation that will occur to them is “Hang on, I don’t think this person can hear me very well”. Instead they are quite ready to believe that you are bored, sceptical, eccentric (but not in a good way), shy, or just plain rude.
I find it very distressing that anyone might think me rude or uncaring, and that’s been a primary driver of my career as a collar-grabber. Besides, people do genuinely want to help but don’t always know how. So I believe there are strong arguments for telling people straight away; but nothing about deafness is simple, and I’ve found that disclosing hearing loss has risks as well as benefits.
Even the opportunity to tell people about your communication needs is a bit of a double-edged sword. You can ask people to speak more slowly and generally they do, but almost everyone will alter their natural speech rhythm as they slow down and this is disastrous for lip reading because you then lose essential contextual clues. It’s surprisingly hard to get this right. Try speaking very clearly at about two-thirds of your normal speed without losing rhythm or natural emphasis; of course while standing in a good light and keeping your face always turned to your listener. If you can do all this and still remember what it was you meant to say, I salute you!
The consequences for lip-reading of asking people to slow down are easy to understand even if hard to address, but there’s a more subtle adjustment going on with slower speech that’s all the more powerful because people are clearly quite unaware that they’re doing it. What I’ve found is that people have a strong tendency to bundle together a need for slow, clear speech with a need for simple concepts. Speaking to a deaf person is not like speaking to a new language learner; or a person with an intellectual disability; or a small child. All of these conversations have their own unique communication needs and it takes conscious effort not to blur the lines. We all know not to shout at a foreigner but it’s equally inappropriate to assume that if someone can’t hear, they can’t manage complexity.
It is deeply uncomfortable to be spoken to as if you have cognitive difficulties, if you don’t; and the resulting conversations are actually more isolating than no conversation at all.
The idea of diminished competence can be tenaciously entwined with deafness even amongst people who’ve had disability training. For example, when flying on your own it seems sensible to let the cabin crew know that you can’t hear announcements. This can be enormously helpful if the flight is delayed, as the crew will keep you updated about what’s going on; and the extra attentiveness is also nice when you need someone to come and take your dinner tray away so that you can work. But it can be a little disconcerting when they try to help you off the plane at the other end, having extrapolated a specific communication need into a generalised, boundless lack of capacity.
I had my first cochlear implant in 2006 and a second-side implant in July 2013. It’s been truly life-transforming, not least because after all these years I can finally let go of people’s collars and “pass” as a hearing person. For me, it’s been a wonderful, but rather bittersweet experience to rediscover how it feels to chat to someone without first having to climb out of the box that they built for me the moment I told them that I couldn’t hear.
Competing interests: No competing interests