Clinical commissioning groups serve too many masters, finds study
BMJ 2013; 347 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f7501 (Published 13 December 2013) Cite this as: BMJ 2013;347:f7501- Zosia Kmietowicz
- 1BMJ
Clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) are accountable to too many masters with potentially competing agendas, say authors of a study in the online journal BMJ Open.1
CCGs, which replaced primary care trusts in April this year and which are responsible for 65% of the NHS budget in England, were set up in part to boost the accountability of those responsible for commissioning care for patients. They also have greater autonomy than their predecessor organisations, but this independence depends in large part on their relations with the bodies that oversee them.
To understand the accountability …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.