Clinical commissioning groups serve too many masters, finds studyBMJ 2013; 347 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f7501 (Published 13 December 2013) Cite this as: BMJ 2013;347:f7501
- Zosia Kmietowicz
Clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) are accountable to too many masters with potentially competing agendas, say authors of a study in the online journal BMJ Open.1
CCGs, which replaced primary care trusts in April this year and which are responsible for 65% of the NHS budget in England, were set up in part to boost the accountability of those responsible for commissioning care for patients. They also have greater autonomy than their predecessor organisations, but this independence depends in large part on their relations with the bodies that oversee them.
To understand the accountability …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial