Editorials
Declaration of transparency for each research article
BMJ 2013; 347 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4796 (Published 07 August 2013) Cite this as: BMJ 2013;347:f4796
Related articles
- Analysis Published: 26 June 2008; BMJ 336 doi:10.1136/bmj.39590.732037.47
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 24 March 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c332
- Research Published: 24 March 2010; BMJ 340 doi:10.1136/bmj.c723
- Research Published: 12 October 2010; BMJ 341 doi:10.1136/bmj.c4737
- Letter Published: 10 September 2013; BMJ 347 doi:10.1136/bmj.f5477
See more
- An adolescent with disabling abdominal painBMJ December 07, 2016, 355 i6101; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6101
- Whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastasesBMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6483; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6483
- Commitment to talking not just treatingBMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6471; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6471
- Doctors need dragging out of their comfort zone to avert the antimicrobial crisis, says lordBMJ December 02, 2016, 355 i6517; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6517
- Association between screening and the thyroid cancer “epidemic” in South Korea: evidence from a nationwide studyBMJ November 30, 2016, 355 i5745; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5745
Cited by...
- Multicentre randomised study of the effect and experience of an early inhome programme (PreHomeCare) for preterm infants using video consultation and smartphone applications compared with inhospital consultations: protocol of the PreHomeCare study
- Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central
- Critical Appraisal of Studies Using Laboratory Animal Models
- Improving biomedical journals' ethical policies: the case of research misconduct
- Institutions must also be accountable for research integrity