Reversal of established practices and other stories . . .BMJ 2013; 347 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4743 (Published 31 July 2013) Cite this as: BMJ 2013;347:f4743
“Most of what you were taught in medical school was wrong,” we’re told. Minerva hopes this is no longer quite true, but a paper called “A Decade of Reversal” in Mayo Clinic Proceedings (2013, doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.05.012) shows that there is still a lot of standard practice in all fields of medicine that doesn’t bear the scrutiny of well conducted trials. Vinay Prasad and colleagues carefully sought every trial published over 2001-10 in the New England Journal of Medicine, which contradicted standard practice at the time of publication. They found 146 such instances, and if you read through the many pages where these are described, you are bound to find a few that surprise you. Every doctor needs to remember the challenge of John Maynard Keynes: “When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?”
It is no secret that the pharmaceutical industry has a hold on many patient support organisations, and that many pharma companies are deeply uneasy about calls for …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial