Should rich countries stop sending development aid to India? YesBMJ 2013; 346 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f78 (Published 10 January 2013) Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f78
- Jayati Ghosh, professor of economics at the Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, School of Social Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India
Poverty, undernutrition, and extreme destitution are rampant in India. Hundreds of millions of people still live in homes without electricity and without access to improved sanitation. Millions of children never finish elementary schooling, and health conditions are still appalling for most.1
Surely this is a country that must get development aid? But when the UK government decided to cut its aid to India, much of the Indian response was indifference or even relief.2 There are several reasons why countries like China and India increasingly feel that they do not want development aid from rich countries.
Firstly, the amounts involved are too small to make a difference in these large emerging economies. In India, for example, aid from the United Kingdom at around £280m (24 600 million rupees; €344m; $450m) amounts to less than 0.04% of India’s national income, and is even smaller than 2% of what the central government spends on the food subsidy and rural employment programmes alone.3 In China the aid amounts seem even more trivial and inconsequential. …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial