Mid Staffs Inquiry

Mid Staffs is evidence of all that is wrong with NHS management

BMJ 2013; 346 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f774 (Published 6 February 2013)
Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f774

Recent rapid responses

Rapid responses are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. Although a selection of rapid responses will be included as edited readers' letters in the weekly print issue of the BMJ, their first appearance online means that they are published articles. If you need the url (web address) of an individual response, perhaps for citation purposes, simply click on the response headline and copy the url from the browser window.

Displaying 1-10 out of 12 published

Can anyone tell me how another Mid Staffs can be avoided if we are having to do more and more with less and less (1)?

1 Anon. Progress in making NHS efficiency savings. National Audit Office. http://www.nao.org.uk/publication /1213/nhs_efficiency_savings.aspx

Competing interests: None declared

Neville W Goodman, Retired Anaesthetist

Bristol, Bristol, BS9 3LW, UK

Click to like:

In addition to the thoughtful and stimulating responses on this sad state of affairs, I feel that there are already some tools available to deal with "difficult management behaviour" or gross professional misconduct. I agree that an explicit set of principles and expectations and regulation would be a step forward as self-regulation by managers does not seem to be working.

I would point out that the NHS does have a code of business standards, that executive level appointments should be through a "good and fit" person test and senior appointment have to be vetted at the highest level. The main issue is enforcing these aspects of self-regulation, does this sound familiar?

Competing interests: None declared

Sean Lynch, Consultant Psychiatrist and Honorary Associate Professor

Devon Partnership NHS Trust and PCMD, Wonford House Hospital, Exeter EX2 5AF

Click to like:

The Robert Francis inquiry into the Mid Staffs trust makes it clear that blinkered cost-cutting was behind the failings in healthcare standards that caused hundreds of unnecessary deaths. It also confirms that practitioners’ warnings about inadequate frontline staffing levels were treated with absolute contempt when layers of bureaucratic management right up to HMG failed to follow them through. This, together with covert threats of reprisal if they spoke out publicly, went on for so long that it eventually broke the spirit of practitioners who, over-whelmed by the unequal struggle, felt obliged to be complicit with bad practice. It was commercialism in a high risk public sector at its very worst that also exposed the principal weakness of contemporary professionalism that must be put right.

Francis makes no less than eighteen very detailed recommendations concerning standards, governance and performance. In my view, however, as was pointed out in earlier reports, the key requirement is for frontline staff to be listened to and their needs met in order for them to be able to take a professional pride in their patient care as well as the reputations of their units and wards. But this still leaves the question of how best the whole culture and hierarchy of NHS management, itself, can be transformed.

I had agreed with Dr Peter Gooderham (of the nascent Centre for Professional Integrity (CPI)) who, immediately prior to his so sad passing, advocated the professionalizing of NHS management with a code of ethics, standards, discipline and sanctions. However, this could clearly take very many years to develop and mature; in the meantime something must be done to help move things in that direction and to ensure that more Mid Staffs cannot take place. This problem is not limited to the NHS, of course, it also applies to other high risk public service sectors. For example, engineers must never forget the Hatfield rail disaster and the Nimrod aircraft crash where, in both cases, deaths were due to a similar blinkered cost-cutting combined with the complicity of engineering professionals. But, quite clearly, as things stand, the NHS problem is by far the most serious and urgent and should be given top priority by all professionals who are concerned about upholding the principle of professional integrity.

In my opinion, what has been happening in some NHS trusts over these last two decades is as damaging to present-day medicine as the corruption of the early 19th century that Dr Thomas Wakley fought against with his Lancet journal. Knowing the power of the early 19th century private medical establishment, he decided that its wrongdoings would, initially, have to be exposed anonymously by those who were close to what was happening. That was how Wakley started to “lance the boil” of jobbery, nepotism and corruption and helped to transform it from a private interest profession into one in the public interest. It was one of the most important events in the history of our learned professions.

In an earlier BMJ Personal View article (BMJ 2009:339:b3055) I had suggested that professionals of different disciplines needed to collaborate with each other in order to uphold the principle of professional integrity and proposed the creation of the CPI. The CPI approach to the present problem is based on the volunteerism that was an integral part of the public interest history and fabric of this country. It sees out-of-house, volunteer professionals, working in pairs, making themselves available to discuss in the strictest confidence a matter that seriously concerns a hospital trust professional. Firstly, they would satisfy themselves that it is based on objective evidence and can be unequivocally substantiated. They would then mutually discuss with that professional how he/she wishes it to be handled and the way it can be raised so as to protect his/her career. It should be noted that the hospital professional will remain in strict control of the whole procedure as he/she would have intended had there been no personal threat. The procedure recommended by the BMA would be followed, starting with careful approaches to line management and only publicly disclosed by the CPI if, and when, after mutual consideration, it is deemed necessary in the public interest. But the whole intention behind this approach is to make it abundantly clear to NHS trusts that an open culture, with proper respect for the public interest duty of professionals, is the only option for managements in the future.

It could be argued that having to turn to fellow professionals to help to assert one’s own professional integrity is demeaning. However, the whole history of the professions was built on volunteers coming together to create their learned bodies and their own culture firmly based on the principle of professional integrity. And in my view, as corporate power became ever-more concentrated and powerful, it was inevitable that cases would arise when concerned professionals of different disciplines would need to collaborate with each other in order to ensure that this precious principle was preserved. The CPI, therefore, appeals to all professionals, particularly semi-retired/retired doctors and engineers, to support this reassertion of true professionalism for the 21st century. Email me: johnroddick@btinternet.com

Let Mid Staffs be the wake up call for all professionals!

John Roddick

Competing interests: None declared

John Roddick, retired consulting engineer

NA, Cardiff

Click to like:

Editor

This is amongst the most important contributions that I have read in the BMJ for some years.

I shall be drawing the attention of others to it.

The necessity to restate the purpose of the NHS - to alleviate the fear of illness, injury, suffering and death - was never more clear.

Management is not and never was on the side of the patients or of the clinicians or of the principled provision of a vital public service or even of politicians. Management is only ever on the side of management.

Efficient administration is what is required. The necessary collaborative impulse between the many functions within the NHS can be best promoted by the advent of telling mutual jeopardy which will abate empire building and the ascendancy of prima donnas.

Yours sincerely

Steve Ford

Competing interests: None declared

Steven Duncan Ford, Retired GP

Haydon Bridge, Haydon Bridge. NE47 6HJ

Click to like:

It is all to easy for doctors to blame the managers and thus bury the bad news of their own misdemeanour's.

There were 42 doctors at least who knew what was happening at North staffs. In the 1990's I have been told that was common knowledge amongst consultants in Bristol about the atrocious outcomes of local paediatric cardiac surgery and referred their own patients to London.

Why does this happen.
Research has shown that CEOs of large companies have a much higher incidence of psychopathic tendencies with lack of empathy. Powerful senior doctors may have also self selected themselves through these same traits.

The press have criticised NHS Trusts for the use of gagging clauses. But senior senior doctors remain free to force more junior doctors to sign gagging clauses not to report them to the GMC for investigation of any alleged wrong doing. While this situation is allowed to continue, this is merely the medical profession using smoke and mirrors and "the pot calling the kettle black".

Competing interests: None declared

David Ansell, Epidemiologist

Independent, London

Click to like:

Once upon a time there was a farmer called Farmer Brown.

Farmer Brown kept pigs, a small number of happy and contented pigs.
He employed a few farmhands to keep the pigs fed and happy. The pigs grew, the farmhands enjoyed their work and the sun shone.

Farmer Brown knew that the annual show was coming up, so he wanted to make sure the pigs were putting on weight. Farmer Brown got the farmhands to weigh the pigs. The weighed them every week, the sun shone and the pigs got fatter.

The farmer had a rival, Farmer Jones from down the road also kept pigs. And his pigs were getting fatter more quickly than Farmer Browns. Farmer Brown got really bothered about the pigs, he got the farmhands to weigh the pigs every day.

Down the pub that evening Farmer Jones boasted about his pigs and how quickly they put on weight, how they were sure to win fattest pig in the annual show. Farmer Brown desperately wanted to win the annual show, so he ordered the farmhands to weigh the pigs every four hours.

Soon the farmhands were running round weighing one pig after the other and filling in complex charts, they had scarcely finished weighing the pigs and writing down their weight, colouring and skin tone, when it was time to start all over again weighing pigs.

A few days later Farmer Brown went past Farmer Jones’s field. He could hear Farmer Jones in the barn calling out the weight of each pig as he weighed them, so his assistant could write the weights down. Farmer Brown knew Farmer Jones’ pigs were heavier. He was beside himself, the pigs had didn’t seem to be putting on weight so he ordered the farmhands to weigh each pig every hour.

The pigs were not getting fatter.
So farmer Brown arranged for a weighing expert to come in and teach the farmhands how to weigh really really accurately.
Farmer Brown spent hours designing and redesigning the forms to record their weights, and he arranged for an expert in charting and mapping to come and show the farmhands how to record the weights more clearly.

Then Farmer Brown made big signs, reminding the farmhands about the four B’s of pig weighing. Farmer Brown checked the forms at the end of each day. Soon there were so many forms he had to take one of the farmhands off weighing to help with reading the forms.

The farmhands were constantly weighing and filling in forms, filling in forms and weighing. There were smart new forms in triplicate, all beautifully filled in.

Still the pigs were no fatter. Farmer Brown bought big shiny new scales, he sent three of the farmhands away for a week to learn how to operate the scales properly so they could teach the others.
The annual show day approached.
Farmer Brown got frustrated, his pigs were not performing, Farmer Jones pigs were much much fatter. Farmer Brown decided there must be something wrong with the farmhands, so he sacked the two slowest workers and the remainder had to work even harder and even faster weighing the pigs.

After a few more days the pigs still seemed to be losing weight, so Farmer Brown decided the forms must be wrong, He found an internet forum which discussed how they could make the form filling more efficient by moving on to computers. Farmer Brown spent thousands of pounds on computers. Each farmhand had a new handheld computer, but the farmhands had to keep on starting again because the pigs trod on the computers making them go haywire.

Then Farmer Brown hired two more people to check on the farmhands and make sure all the weighing were being recorded accurately, to remind them of the importance of pig weighing, to put up new posters, to tell them to work harder if they hadn’t weighed enough pigs that day, and to check that the weights were correct.
They were all very busy.

Finally a young lad pointed out that no-one was feeding the pigs.
He was sacked for telling tales

Moral: You don’t fatten a pig by weighing it.

Competing interests: None declared

Alison J Gray, Consultant Psychiatrist

2-Gether NHS foundation trust, Hereford

Click to like:

In medicine we have for many years aimed to use treatments for which there is a good evidence base. Does anyone know what is the evidence base for the employment of lay managers in the NHS

Competing interests: None declared

John W Myles, Retired Orthopaedic Surgeon

none

RSM, 1 Wimpole St., London

Click to like:

I agree with Heather Wood's analysis but feel her diagnosis of organisational pathology could go deeper. Clearly too many managers in the NHS in England are paying insufficient attention to the interests of patients but we need to understand why.

The culture described by Francis is essentially bullying. This stems from politicians and the culture of the NHS. Survival as a Trust Chief Executive depends on satisfying uncompromising central directives. Those who offer a challenge, in defence of the interests of patients, put their jobs and careers at risk. Some avoid the problem by voting with their feet.

In contrast, those who comply are rewarded. This includes honours and promotion to regional and national posts without open competition or objective assessment.

The technique for silencing managerial dissent is to commission a review by former SHA Chief Executives or management consultants who obligingly fail to find sufficient evidence to uphold the complaint. The regulators are complicit in this process.

Although Dr Wood's own investigation of Mid Staffordshire appears to have been effective, both Monitor and CQC have shown marked disinclination to investigate complex organisational pathology involving alleged management malpractice. The unions tend to focus on securing redress for individual members. The Institute of Healthcare Management is moribund.

Francis decries structural solutions but structure is the architecture for human behaviour. Mindless targets are not the only problem. The English NHS 'market' (now abandoned by Scotland and Wales) provides perverse incentives, encourages competitive secrecy and the associated suppression of unwelcome criticism.

In my view, the NHS in England requires a fundamental rethink, starting with a 'bottom-up' analysis of the organisational arrangements required to support local health gain and integrated patient care. Meanwhile, a cull of those who are skilled in the dark arts of devolving blame to the front line, would send a powerful signal that politicians are serious about putting patients first.

Competing interests: Retired Chief Executive of North Wales Health Authority and of NHS trusts and health authorities in England. Married to a former NHS Medical Director

David M Hands, Visiting Professor In Health Policy and Management

University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd CF371DL

Click to like:

One of the disastrous effects of general management was to transfer the holding of consultant contracts from the 'higher' regional health authority to the 'lower' health authorities. This left the consultant extremely vulnerable to non-clinical management actions when opposing changes that damaged clinical care. If my contract had been with my local health authorities I would have lost my job several times over when opposing damaging management actions on clinical services. I was supported by my regional colleagues and survived. I would urge that consultant and senior trainee contracts are held at a higher level than that of the health authority in which they work. While this will be strongly opposed by NHS management at all levels and by politicians it might just be possible under the present conditions that follow on from Stafford.

Competing interests: None declared

David H MARJOT, Consultant Psychiatrist

Self, Weybridge, Surrey. KT13

Click to like:

Peter Mahaffey has excellently summarised many of the elements that I perceive as problem areas.

Here are some further observations on the Inquiry Report -parts of it quoted below:

64. The codes of conduct and guidance for directors make it clear that their duty is
to provide strategic direction and that they should refrain from intervening in
operational detail, but that they are collectively accountable for all aspects of the
performance of the Trust.

66. The non-executive directors, including the Chair, had an appreciation that there
were serious deficiencies in certain areas of the Trust’s operation. The Chair
provided a list of them to the Inquiry. The other non-executives supported her to
set about remedying these by the replacement of the Chief Executive. ................

Gentlemen's agreements and custom and practice were the means by which the healthcare professions and the executives co-existed and collaborated when my Consultant career started.

Nowadays financial mismanagement is the only sin that seems to fetter a modern CEO's activities.

From the Francis Inquiry Report, Para 64 (above) of the Executive summary, one is left wondering how the holder of this pivotal office is constrained and advised. There seems to be no effective means of ensuring that CEOs carry out their duties in a capable and exemplary manner.

In practice, this may rarely be necessary. One can argue, however, that with weakening of professional influence on management, and a tendency for there to be less managerial engagement of Consultants the Non-Executive Directors as expert lay-people should have enhanced powers. I hope I am missing a point.

Competing interests: None declared

Reginald Michael Sherratt, Consultant Physician

Luton & Dunstable Hospital, Lewsey Road Luton LU4 0DZ

Click to like:

THIS WEEK'S POLL