Should rich countries stop sending development aid to India? NoBMJ 2013; 346 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f73 (Published 10 January 2013) Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f73
- Nisha Agrawal, chief executive officer of Oxfam India, 2nd Floor, 1, Community Centre, New Friends Colony, New Delhi 110 025, India
The UK’s recent decision to end aid to India from 2015 seems to have been taken after a media debate that generated more heat than light. India, the British public were told, is a powerhouse that has moved up the international economic league achieving middle income status. It could and should do more to tackle its own poverty, and it doesn’t need outside help.1
But when you look beneath the headlines about India’s space programme and burgeoning economy, you find a country that is home to a third of the world’s poor people and that cannot afford to eliminate domestic poverty.
There are more than 400 million people in India living below the global extreme poverty line of $1.25 (69 rupees, £0.77; €0.95) a day—more than the combined total populations of the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom.2 …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial