Comparative effect sizes in randomised trials from less developed and more developed countries: meta-epidemiological assessment

BMJ 2013; 346 doi: (Published 12 February 2013)
Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f707

Related articles

Research Methods & Reporting: Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials

Analysis: The need to consider the wider agenda in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: breadth, timing, and depth of the evidence

Analysis: Uncertainty in heterogeneity estimates in meta-analyses

News: Developing countries need stronger ethical guidelines on research

Education and debate: Academic medicine: the evidence base

Education and debate: Resuscitating clinical research in the United Kingdom

Paper: Relation between burden of disease and randomised evidence in sub-Saharan Africa: survey of research

Paper: Review of randomised controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine

Paper: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

Education and debate: Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews

See more

Research News: Impact of polypill difficult to demonstrate from varied studies, say Cochrane reviewers

Editor's Choice: The pressures of pregnancy

Feature: Some progress and some missed targets in the TB epidemic

Research: Chronic hypertension and pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis

Editorial: Chronic hypertension during pregnancy

This article has been cited by other articles: