Editorials

Interventions to enhance self management support

BMJ 2013; 346 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f3949 (Published 19 June 2013) Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f3949
  1. Xin Sun, senior researcher12,
  2. Gordon H Guyatt, professor23
  1. 1Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  2. 2Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  3. 3Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  1. sunx26{at}gmail.com

Add no noticeable value to the benefits of existing care for chronic conditions

Clinical trialists, interested in ensuring that their interventions are effective in the real world of clinical practice, have long called for study designs—termed practical, pragmatic, or effectiveness—that reflect practice as closely as possible.1 These practical trials are particularly important in health services research, which can involve apparently effective interventions that are resource intensive and implemented by charismatic enthusiasts. Such interventions are likely to fail when introduced into settings with fewer resources by doctors preoccupied with the considerable stresses of everyday practice. In a linked paper by Kennedy and colleagues (doi:10.1136/bmj.f2882), we learn that effective interventions in health services are often not feasible and—as revealed by practical trials—feasible interventions are often not effective.2

In a cluster randomised controlled trial, Kennedy and colleagues investigated whether self management interventions targeting care providers could improve outcomes over 12 months in patients with diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, and …

View Full Text

Sign in

Log in through your institution

Free trial

Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial

Subscribe